Age-Based Left-Digit Bias in the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Left digit bias, where the left-most digit disproportionately influences decision-making, can impact treatment decisions and patient outcomes. This study examines how such bias may affect treatment decisions for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on differences between patients aged 79 and 80. A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2020) analyzed patients with PDAC aged 79 and 80. The primary exposure was age-based left-digit bias. The main outcomes measured included differences in treatment received and overall survival. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, regression discontinuity analysis, multivariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 5,304 patients (2,718 aged 79, 2,586 aged 80), chemotherapy use was higher in 79-year-olds (50.3%) than 80-year-olds (45.1%) (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in surgery or radiation. Chemotherapy was associated with lower mortality risk (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79–0.92, p < 0.01). Adjusted overall survival was similar between groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93–1.07, p = 0.91). Left digit bias was observed in the treatment of PDAC, with a tendency to favor chemotherapy for patients aged 79 over 80. This highlights the need for age-neutral decision-making in treatment planning to avoid biases that could impact patient care and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01459-1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age-Based Left-Digit Bias in the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Bryan Trottier, Todd M. Tuttle, Jacob S. Ankeny, Qianyun Luo et al.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Age-Based Left-Digit Bias in the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Bryan Trottier, Todd M. Tuttle, Jacob S. Ankeny, Qianyun Luo, E. Jensen, David G. Brauer, Schelomo Marmor, Christopher J. LaRocca, Jane Yuet Ching Hui, B. Ozed-Williams
article en

Abstract

Left digit bias, where the left-most digit disproportionately influences decision-making, can impact treatment decisions and patient outcomes. This study examines how such bias may affect treatment decisions for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on differences between patients aged 79 and 80. A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2020) analyzed patients with PDAC aged 79 and 80. The primary exposure was age-based left-digit bias. The main outcomes measured included differences in treatment received and overall survival. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, regression discontinuity analysis, multivariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 5,304 patients (2,718 aged 79, 2,586 aged 80), chemotherapy use was higher in 79-year-olds (50.3%) than 80-year-olds (45.1%) (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in surgery or radiation. Chemotherapy was associated with lower mortality risk (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79–0.92, p < 0.01). Adjusted overall survival was similar between groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93–1.07, p = 0.91). Left digit bias was observed in the treatment of PDAC, with a tendency to favor chemotherapy for patients aged 79 over 80. This highlights the need for age-neutral decision-making in treatment planning to avoid biases that could impact patient care and outcomes.

Journal of Gastrointestinal CancerVol. 57(1)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.