Impact of Non‐Classical Gravity‐Wave Dynamics on Middle‐Atmosphere Mean Flow and Solar Tides

Abstract Conventional gravity‐wave (GW) parameterizations neglect three aspects of GW dynamics. Instead of momentum and entropy fluxes they use Eliassen‐Palm fluxes, thereby neglecting the possibility that resolved flow are not in geostrophic and hydrostatic balance. They neglect the transience of the GW field and of the resolved flow, by determining at every time step equilibrium profiles of GW fluxes that would result if the vertical GW propagation were instantaneous. Moreover, they also do not take into account lateral GW propagation and horizontal GW fluxes. Because the prognostic GW model MS‐GWaM does not need to make these assumptions, it has been used in the global weather and climate code ICON to investigate their consequences for the simulation of monthly mean zonal mean flows and of solar tides. All three aspects are found to influence the simulation results significantly. The mean circulation in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere is affected at all latitudes and in the stratosphere as well. This together with the directly modified GW forcing leads also to significant differences in the migrating and nonmigrating components of solar tides. Comparisons with tides retrieved from satellite data are most favorable if both aspects are taken into account. This argues for a correspondingly generalized treatment of GW dynamics in their parameterization, as an efficient alternative to GW permitting simulations.