Glaserian Classic Grounded Theory and Descriptive Phenomenology

Though one may presume that all qualitative designs are similar—and to a certain degree, they are, there are some similarities and differences in two designs—phenomenology and Glaserian classic grounded theory—which need to be explored in a more nuanced manner. By explaining these connections and divergences, less-experienced researchers will not only gain a greater understanding of the designs, but also will be able to make more informed decisions about them. Though the use of description to talk about the given experience is not encouraged in Glaserian classic grounded theory, on some level initially it is present, whereas in phenomenology description of the experience is foundational and inextricably linked to the design. In both designs, a researcher needs to set aside judgments, theories, and previous ideas to see the data as purely as possible. Once greater focus is achieved, there are different ways, according to the design, that the researcher will assemble the data into a coherent explanation of the experience. In this paper, several connections and points of difference will be presented.