Environmental DNA reveals hidden eukaryotic diversity and fine-scale community patterns across seascape areas in the Northern Red Sea

Understanding how reef-associated biodiversity responds to seascape features is essential for monitoring and conserving coral reef ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from seawater provides access to benthopelagic eukaryotic diversity but its relationship with benthic structure remains poorly understood. We conducted simultaneous assessment of benthopelagic eDNA derived from near-reef seawater and benthic photoquadrat surveys across 12 coral reef sites in the northern Red Sea, spanning three seascape regions: the Gulf of Aqaba, nearshore Northern Red Sea (NRS), and offshore NRS. We examined whether spatial patterns in benthopelagic eDNA communities were structured across regions and whether variation in benthic cover explained differences in eDNA-derived assemblages obtained from water samples. Benthopelagic eDNA revealed fine-scale spatial structuring across regions but showed non-significant whole-community correlation with benthic composition. When examined by major taxonomic groups, taxon-specific relationships emerged, with some taxa (i.e., Micromonas sp.) showing increasing relative abundances in reefs characterized by lower benthic complexity. While traditional photoquadrat surveys captured 72 benthic sessile taxa including dominant benthic groups (e.g. hard corals and algae) across four eukaryotic phyla, benthopelagic eDNA documented a broader range of eukaryotic diversity, including planktonic, cryptic, and low abundant taxa spanning 35 phyla. Notably, eDNA detected cryptic organisms overlooked by visual surveys, such the giant clam Tridacna sp., even where present but not recorded in photoquadrats. Our results demonstrate that benthopelagic eDNA and visual surveys provide complementary perspectives on reef biodiversity. Rather than serving as a direct proxy for benthic structure, benthopelagic eDNA captures spatial and taxonomic patterns that may be overlooked by visual transects, supporting its use in seascape-scale biodiversity assessments and conservation planning efforts in dynamic and understudied reef systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47093-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental DNA reveals hidden eukaryotic diversity and fine-scale community patterns across seascape areas in the Northern Red Sea

Ameer A. Eweida, Viktor Nunes Peinemann, Maggie D. Johnson, Warren R. Francis et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
21.74
article

Environmental DNA reveals hidden eukaryotic diversity and fine-scale community patterns across seascape areas in the Northern Red Sea

Ameer A. Eweida, Viktor Nunes Peinemann, Maggie D. Johnson, Warren R. Francis, Flor Torres, Basmah Alabdulaziz, Gloria Gil-Ramos, Joao G Duarte Rosado, Karla Gonzalez, Morgan Bennett-Smith, Michael L. Berumen, Matthew David Tietbohl Talas, Susana Carvalho, Eva Aylagas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding how reef-associated biodiversity responds to seascape features is essential for monitoring and conserving coral reef ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from seawater provides access to benthopelagic eukaryotic diversity but its relationship with benthic structure remains poorly understood. We conducted simultaneous assessment of benthopelagic eDNA derived from near-reef seawater and benthic photoquadrat surveys across 12 coral reef sites in the northern Red Sea, spanning three seascape regions: the Gulf of Aqaba, nearshore Northern Red Sea (NRS), and offshore NRS. We examined whether spatial patterns in benthopelagic eDNA communities were structured across regions and whether variation in benthic cover explained differences in eDNA-derived assemblages obtained from water samples. Benthopelagic eDNA revealed fine-scale spatial structuring across regions but showed non-significant whole-community correlation with benthic composition. When examined by major taxonomic groups, taxon-specific relationships emerged, with some taxa (i.e., Micromonas sp.) showing increasing relative abundances in reefs characterized by lower benthic complexity. While traditional photoquadrat surveys captured 72 benthic sessile taxa including dominant benthic groups (e.g. hard corals and algae) across four eukaryotic phyla, benthopelagic eDNA documented a broader range of eukaryotic diversity, including planktonic, cryptic, and low abundant taxa spanning 35 phyla. Notably, eDNA detected cryptic organisms overlooked by visual surveys, such the giant clam Tridacna sp., even where present but not recorded in photoquadrats. Our results demonstrate that benthopelagic eDNA and visual surveys provide complementary perspectives on reef biodiversity. Rather than serving as a direct proxy for benthic structure, benthopelagic eDNA captures spatial and taxonomic patterns that may be overlooked by visual transects, supporting its use in seascape-scale biodiversity assessments and conservation planning efforts in dynamic and understudied reef systems.

Scientific Reports
Boston University (US), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (SA), University of Miami (US), Marine Conservation Institute (US), Biomedical Research Foundation (BD), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
21.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.