Student assignments with preferences and maximum diversity

Abstract The paper considers the assignment of students to seminars regarding three hierarchical objectives: maximizing the students’ preferences, maximizing the within seminar diversity, minimizing the between seminar diversity variation. While the first objective pictures the students, preferences, the second and third picture the school’s preference of having comparable seminar groups. To reach this aim the paper extends the well-known Maximally Diverse Grouping Problem and its balanced version by the first objective, the students’ interests. The students’ interests are pictured by a preference sequence the students have for the offered seminars, e.g. because of the scheduled time, the topic or the lecturer. We present solution approaches that include properties from game theory in the assignment and result in an assignment of students to seminars including the students’ as well as the school’s preferences. Our results show that the presented solution approaches are able to solve instances of practical relevant size within half an hour (close to) optimality. Furthermore, in our artificial test instances, including student preferences in the assignment only led to a small reduction of the maximal diversity for instances of realistic size (2–3% difference for seminars with 20 students).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Operations Research
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-026-07189-8
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student assignments with preferences and maximum diversity

Arne Schulz
Annals of Operations Research
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
article

Student assignments with preferences and maximum diversity

Arne Schulz
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper considers the assignment of students to seminars regarding three hierarchical objectives: maximizing the students’ preferences, maximizing the within seminar diversity, minimizing the between seminar diversity variation. While the first objective pictures the students, preferences, the second and third picture the school’s preference of having comparable seminar groups. To reach this aim the paper extends the well-known Maximally Diverse Grouping Problem and its balanced version by the first objective, the students’ interests. The students’ interests are pictured by a preference sequence the students have for the offered seminars, e.g. because of the scheduled time, the topic or the lecturer. We present solution approaches that include properties from game theory in the assignment and result in an assignment of students to seminars including the students’ as well as the school’s preferences. Our results show that the presented solution approaches are able to solve instances of practical relevant size within half an hour (close to) optimality. Furthermore, in our artificial test instances, including student preferences in the assignment only led to a small reduction of the maximal diversity for instances of realistic size (2–3% difference for seminars with 20 students).

Annals of Operations ResearchVol. 360(2-3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.