Addressing Gaps in the Chicago Classification Version 4.0: Defining an Optimal Intrabolus Pressure Measurement on Esophageal Manometry

BACKGROUND: Intrabolus pressure (IBP) reflects the pressure within the esophageal lumen during bolus transit and serves as a physiologic marker of outflow resistance at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The lack of a standardized or validated method to measure IBP is a critical limitation for interpreting high resolution manometry (HRM) and identification of clinically relevant EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO). METHODS: Three distinct cohorts, "Controls", Normal motility", and "conclusive EGJOO" were selected from a prospectively enrolled cohort of adult patients. All patients had at least undergone HRM with impedance (HRIM), and functional lumen impedance probe (FLIP) testing. 4D HRM analysis was performed blinded to clinical characteristics. 4D HRM IBP results were assessed on a per-swallow and also on a per-patient level. Receiver operating curve (ROCs) to assess each metrics prediction of conclusive EGJOO vs. not EGJOO (normal motility and controls) were utilized for the per-swallow analysis. KEY RESULTS: 33 controls, 35 normal motility, and 15 conclusive EGJOO patients were included. Swallow level analysis was conducted on 156 swallows, 165 swallows, and 61 swallows from each group, respectively. Per-swallow analysis demonstrated differences between conclusive EGJOO, normal motility, and controls for all ten IBP measures (P-values < 0.001), with greater IBP measures in conclusive EGJOO than in normal motility and controls. The 1 s max IBP had the greatest AUROC. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Standardized measurement of IBP using an optimized method (1-s max IBP) within the 4D-HRM framework with impedance-confirmed bolus tracking and phase-specific measures represents a physiologically grounded and clinically meaningful advance in HRIM interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70320
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Gaps in the Chicago Classification Version 4.0: Defining an Optimal Intrabolus Pressure Measurement on Esophageal Manometry

Aidan Smires, Muhammed Alikhan, Wenjun Kou, Neelesh A. Patankar et al.
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Addressing Gaps in the Chicago Classification Version 4.0: Defining an Optimal Intrabolus Pressure Measurement on Esophageal Manometry

Aidan Smires, Muhammed Alikhan, Wenjun Kou, Neelesh A. Patankar, Dustin A. Carlson, Jacob M. Schauer, John E. Pandolfino
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrabolus pressure (IBP) reflects the pressure within the esophageal lumen during bolus transit and serves as a physiologic marker of outflow resistance at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The lack of a standardized or validated method to measure IBP is a critical limitation for interpreting high resolution manometry (HRM) and identification of clinically relevant EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO). METHODS: Three distinct cohorts, "Controls", Normal motility", and "conclusive EGJOO" were selected from a prospectively enrolled cohort of adult patients. All patients had at least undergone HRM with impedance (HRIM), and functional lumen impedance probe (FLIP) testing. 4D HRM analysis was performed blinded to clinical characteristics. 4D HRM IBP results were assessed on a per-swallow and also on a per-patient level. Receiver operating curve (ROCs) to assess each metrics prediction of conclusive EGJOO vs. not EGJOO (normal motility and controls) were utilized for the per-swallow analysis. KEY RESULTS: 33 controls, 35 normal motility, and 15 conclusive EGJOO patients were included. Swallow level analysis was conducted on 156 swallows, 165 swallows, and 61 swallows from each group, respectively. Per-swallow analysis demonstrated differences between conclusive EGJOO, normal motility, and controls for all ten IBP measures (P-values < 0.001), with greater IBP measures in conclusive EGJOO than in normal motility and controls. The 1 s max IBP had the greatest AUROC. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Standardized measurement of IBP using an optimized method (1-s max IBP) within the 4D-HRM framework with impedance-confirmed bolus tracking and phase-specific measures represents a physiologically grounded and clinically meaningful advance in HRIM interpretation.

Neurogastroenterology & MotilityVol. 38(4)
Northwestern University (US), McCormick (United States) (US), Northwestern Medicine (US)
U.S. Public Health Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.