Common practice elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for gaming disorder: A systematic review and expert panel evaluation

Gaming disorder (GD) is an addictive disorder with health and social impacts recognized by the World Health Organization. Although the GD treatment evidence base appear to favor cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), knowledge of its common practice elements is limited. This systematic review critically evaluates CBT interventions for GD, encompassing individual, group, and mixed approaches, to identify and synthesize common practice elements. Employing a systematic review protocol following PRISMA guidelines and guided by an international expert panel, this review identified CBT studies and then critically reviewed their associated treatment manuals, guidelines, handouts, and related resources. A database search yielding 8479 results identified 28 studies from 12 countries reporting on 22 CBT interventions (n = 7 individual; n = 7 group; n = 8 mixed). Study authors were invited to share intervention materials, which were then independently coded and synthesized. Overall, 14 common practice elements were identified. The most frequent element was emotion regulation skills training (n = 21; 95.5%), followed by psychoeducation (n = 20; 90.9%) and cognitive restructuring (n = 19; 86.4%). Exposure techniques, and strength identification and self-compassion were the least frequent (n = 6; 27.3%). All individual CBT interventions used behavioral activation, psychoeducation, and relapse prevention, whereas emotion regulation skills training was the most frequently used element in group CBT. These findings reveal commonly reported CBT practice elements in the GD evidence base and provide expert summaries of established and less utilized therapeutic techniques. Improving the field's shared understanding of CBT is foundational to advancing GD clinical research and a model of best practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology Review
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102740
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common practice elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for gaming disorder: A systematic review and expert panel evaluation

Anna Söderpalm Gordh, Muddsar Hameed, Isabel Brandhorst, Sanni Behm et al.
Clinical Psychology Review
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Common practice elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for gaming disorder: A systematic review and expert panel evaluation

Anna Söderpalm Gordh, Muddsar Hameed, Isabel Brandhorst, Sanni Behm, Vega González-Bueso, Per Bore, Paul Delfabbro, Henk Rigter, Annika Hofstedt, Marcela Radünz, Susumu Higuchi, Kerstin Paschke, Gian Sugiana Sugara, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson, Matthew W.R. Stevens, Juan José Santamaria, Ståle Pallesen, Zsolt Demetrovics, Woraphat Ratta-apha, Philip Nielsen, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Stephan Herpertz, Marc N. Potenza, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Daniel L. King, Klaus Wölfling
article en

Abstract

Gaming disorder (GD) is an addictive disorder with health and social impacts recognized by the World Health Organization. Although the GD treatment evidence base appear to favor cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), knowledge of its common practice elements is limited. This systematic review critically evaluates CBT interventions for GD, encompassing individual, group, and mixed approaches, to identify and synthesize common practice elements. Employing a systematic review protocol following PRISMA guidelines and guided by an international expert panel, this review identified CBT studies and then critically reviewed their associated treatment manuals, guidelines, handouts, and related resources. A database search yielding 8479 results identified 28 studies from 12 countries reporting on 22 CBT interventions (n = 7 individual; n = 7 group; n = 8 mixed). Study authors were invited to share intervention materials, which were then independently coded and synthesized. Overall, 14 common practice elements were identified. The most frequent element was emotion regulation skills training (n = 21; 95.5%), followed by psychoeducation (n = 20; 90.9%) and cognitive restructuring (n = 19; 86.4%). Exposure techniques, and strength identification and self-compassion were the least frequent (n = 6; 27.3%). All individual CBT interventions used behavioral activation, psychoeducation, and relapse prevention, whereas emotion regulation skills training was the most frequently used element in group CBT. These findings reveal commonly reported CBT practice elements in the GD evidence base and provide expert summaries of established and less utilized therapeutic techniques. Improving the field's shared understanding of CBT is foundational to advancing GD clinical research and a model of best practice.

Clinical Psychology ReviewVol. 126
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Siriraj Hospital (TH), Universität Hamburg (DE), Flinders University (AU), Malmö University (SE), Lund University (SE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Mahidol University (TH), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Health Net (US), Yale University (US), Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik (ID), Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center (JP), Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Gibraltar Health Authority (GI), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), Greo (CA), LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum (DE), University of Bergen (NO), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Tübingen (DE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.