A Digital Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program Integrated With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use can improve glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes when used regularly alongside an in-person digital diabetes self-management and education support (DSMES) program. However, to date there is limited evidence showing the benefits of a digitally-delivered DSMES program combined with real-time CGM for adults with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a DSMES program coupled with CGM on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and CGM-derived glycemic measures compared to usual care for adults with type 2 diabetes over 6 months. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥8% (64 mmol/mol) not using mealtime bolus insulin (26-83 years old; mean HbA1c: 9.6% [81.2 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned to a digital DSMES + CGM integrated solution (n=51) or usual care (n=49) for 6 months. The primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were CGM-derived glycemic measures, including glucose management indicator (GMI), percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR), above range (TAR; >180 mg/dL), and below range (TBR; <70 mg/dL), and mean glucose. Linear mixed effects models were used for intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: HbA1c was lower among intervention versus usual care at 3 months (difference=-0.7% [-8.1 mmol/mol]; P=.03) and at 6 months (difference=-0.6% [-6.9 mmol/mol]; P=.12) but only reached statistical significance at 3 months. CGM-derived glycemic measures, including GMI (difference=-0.9%; P=.03), TIR (difference=14.6%; P=.04), and TAR (difference=-14.9%; P=.04), and mean glucose (difference=-36.4 mg/dL; P=.03) were also significantly improved for intervention vs usual care at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of digital DSMES + CGM is effective for supporting adults with type 2 diabetes in managing their condition and has potential to reduce the risk of long-term health complications. CLINICALTRIAL: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05368454).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/78321
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Digital Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program Integrated With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carolyn Bradner Jasik, Christian Cerrada, Timothy C. Dunn, Sean R. Zion et al.
PubMed
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

A Digital Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program Integrated With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carolyn Bradner Jasik, Christian Cerrada, Timothy C. Dunn, Sean R. Zion, Jenna Napoleone, Amanda McGuill, Jeanean B. Naqvi, Ashley Berthoumieux, Hyun Jung Lee, Sarah Linke, David Kerr
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use can improve glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes when used regularly alongside an in-person digital diabetes self-management and education support (DSMES) program. However, to date there is limited evidence showing the benefits of a digitally-delivered DSMES program combined with real-time CGM for adults with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a DSMES program coupled with CGM on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and CGM-derived glycemic measures compared to usual care for adults with type 2 diabetes over 6 months. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥8% (64 mmol/mol) not using mealtime bolus insulin (26-83 years old; mean HbA1c: 9.6% [81.2 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned to a digital DSMES + CGM integrated solution (n=51) or usual care (n=49) for 6 months. The primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were CGM-derived glycemic measures, including glucose management indicator (GMI), percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR), above range (TAR; >180 mg/dL), and below range (TBR; <70 mg/dL), and mean glucose. Linear mixed effects models were used for intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: HbA1c was lower among intervention versus usual care at 3 months (difference=-0.7% [-8.1 mmol/mol]; P=.03) and at 6 months (difference=-0.6% [-6.9 mmol/mol]; P=.12) but only reached statistical significance at 3 months. CGM-derived glycemic measures, including GMI (difference=-0.9%; P=.03), TIR (difference=14.6%; P=.04), and TAR (difference=-14.9%; P=.04), and mean glucose (difference=-36.4 mg/dL; P=.03) were also significantly improved for intervention vs usual care at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of digital DSMES + CGM is effective for supporting adults with type 2 diabetes in managing their condition and has potential to reduce the risk of long-term health complications. CLINICALTRIAL: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05368454).

PubMed
Sutter Health (US), Evidation Health (United States) (US), San Francisco Department of Public Health (US), Diabetes Care Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.