State Support for Scripture in the Public Education System

many of which were at least partially funded by the colonial government. 6 However, further change was on the horizon.After it became apparent that the denominational system was leading to inefficient allocation of resources and the production of poor educational outcomes, and in response to intense sectarian tensions within Australian society, colonial legislatures one by one introduced government schools and abolished state funding for religious schools. 7 The colonies started to legislate on government schools in the Australian colonies in the following order: New South Wales (1848), 8 South Australia (1851), Tasmania (1868), Western Australia (1871), Victoria (1872), and Queensland (1875). 9However, the colonies abolished state aid to denominational Christian schools in a different order: South Australia (1851), 10 Victoria (1872), 11 Queensland (1881), New South Wales (1883), Tasmania (1885), and Western Australia (1895). 12 Importantly, there is now a heated contemporary debate over whether or not these secular education Acts were motivated by a desire to purge public education of all trace of religion, such that they fit within a 'greater secular liberal progress narrative in Australian culture'. 13 If this was so, then the current maintenance of Scripture teaching in public schools would arguably be a betrayal of the intent behind these legislative developments.However, scholars such as Hastie and Chavura, Gascoigne, and Tregenza have, with considerable force, rebutted the thrust of this argument, claiming that it is motivated by 'an explicit purpose of validating contemporary ideology' 14 and that it commits the fallacy of 'retrojecting [scholars'] own contemporary understanding of the secular-sacred distinction onto historic debates'. 15 In place of this ideological liberal view, Hastie and Chavura et al. have argued that the 'secular' education these statutes refer to, when read in context, denotes non-denominational Christian 6 Babie (n 3) 29; Barker (n 2) 150.The very first Appropriation Act of the NSW Legislative Council provided hundreds of pounds for Presbyterian clergy and Catholic schools (although, it should be noted that it provided thousands of pounds for Anglican clergy and Anglican schools): Appropriation Act 1832 (NSW) s 3. 7 Barker (n 2) 149-50; David Hastie, 'The Latest Instalment in the Whig Interpretation of Australian Education History:

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Law and Religion
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55803/j401k
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Support for Scripture in the Public Education System

Jacob Carson
Australian Journal of Law and Religion
Religious Education and Schools
article

State Support for Scripture in the Public Education System

Jacob Carson
article en

Abstract

many of which were at least partially funded by the colonial government. 6 However, further change was on the horizon.After it became apparent that the denominational system was leading to inefficient allocation of resources and the production of poor educational outcomes, and in response to intense sectarian tensions within Australian society, colonial legislatures one by one introduced government schools and abolished state funding for religious schools. 7 The colonies started to legislate on government schools in the Australian colonies in the following order: New South Wales (1848), 8 South Australia (1851), Tasmania (1868), Western Australia (1871), Victoria (1872), and Queensland (1875). 9However, the colonies abolished state aid to denominational Christian schools in a different order: South Australia (1851), 10 Victoria (1872), 11 Queensland (1881), New South Wales (1883), Tasmania (1885), and Western Australia (1895). 12 Importantly, there is now a heated contemporary debate over whether or not these secular education Acts were motivated by a desire to purge public education of all trace of religion, such that they fit within a 'greater secular liberal progress narrative in Australian culture'. 13 If this was so, then the current maintenance of Scripture teaching in public schools would arguably be a betrayal of the intent behind these legislative developments.However, scholars such as Hastie and Chavura, Gascoigne, and Tregenza have, with considerable force, rebutted the thrust of this argument, claiming that it is motivated by 'an explicit purpose of validating contemporary ideology' 14 and that it commits the fallacy of 'retrojecting [scholars'] own contemporary understanding of the secular-sacred distinction onto historic debates'. 15 In place of this ideological liberal view, Hastie and Chavura et al. have argued that the 'secular' education these statutes refer to, when read in context, denotes non-denominational Christian 6 Babie (n 3) 29; Barker (n 2) 150.The very first Appropriation Act of the NSW Legislative Council provided hundreds of pounds for Presbyterian clergy and Catholic schools (although, it should be noted that it provided thousands of pounds for Anglican clergy and Anglican schools): Appropriation Act 1832 (NSW) s 3. 7 Barker (n 2) 149-50; David Hastie, 'The Latest Instalment in the Whig Interpretation of Australian Education History:

Australian Journal of Law and ReligionVol. 7
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.