Patient-tailored brachytherapy applicator development in compliance with the EU medical device regulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical introduction of in-house developed medical devices in Europe requires conformity to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 Article 5(5). Published experience on regulatory aspects of these devices is limited. This work describes our in-house development and verifications of the 3D printed patient-tailored ARCHITECT brachytherapy applicator and accompanying software, prepared to support clinical investigation and in-house use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Article 5(5) mandates an 'appropriate' quality management system (QMS) and exempts in-house medical devices from all MDR requirements except general safety and performance requirements (GSPRs). An institutional QMS was available, comprising documented procedures and fill-in templates for all project phases to compile technical documentation. In the first phase, the QMS requires a market analysis to justify the in-house exemption. In the design phase a prototype is developed, to be iteratively improved during manufacturing and verification phases, based on risk evaluations, verification tests, and processing constraints. Documentation is lastly compiled to support clinical investigations and routine use of the device. RESULTS: After confirming that no suitable marketed device was available, risk-based design and manufacturing approaches were used to safeguard in-house development. Verifications of material, manufacturing, mechanical safety, cleaning and sterilisation, use and workflow, and compatibility with procedures showed compliance with GSPRs. Simulated dosimetric benefits were observed compared to marketed devices. CONCLUSION: The ARCHITECT applicator was developed in a systematic process, resulting in documented workflows and verification steps. Our approach provides a practical framework for MDR-compliant introduction of in-house equipment and can inform future best practice guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Medica
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2026.105783
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-tailored brachytherapy applicator development in compliance with the EU medical device regulation

Remi A. Nout, Nick J. van de Berg, Robin Straathof, Jenny Dankelman et al.
Physica Medica
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Patient-tailored brachytherapy applicator development in compliance with the EU medical device regulation

Remi A. Nout, Nick J. van de Berg, Robin Straathof, Jenny Dankelman, S. van Vliet-Pérez, Ben Heijmen, Henrike Westerveld, Linda S.G.L Wauben, Inger-Karine K. Kolkman-Deurloo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical introduction of in-house developed medical devices in Europe requires conformity to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 Article 5(5). Published experience on regulatory aspects of these devices is limited. This work describes our in-house development and verifications of the 3D printed patient-tailored ARCHITECT brachytherapy applicator and accompanying software, prepared to support clinical investigation and in-house use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Article 5(5) mandates an 'appropriate' quality management system (QMS) and exempts in-house medical devices from all MDR requirements except general safety and performance requirements (GSPRs). An institutional QMS was available, comprising documented procedures and fill-in templates for all project phases to compile technical documentation. In the first phase, the QMS requires a market analysis to justify the in-house exemption. In the design phase a prototype is developed, to be iteratively improved during manufacturing and verification phases, based on risk evaluations, verification tests, and processing constraints. Documentation is lastly compiled to support clinical investigations and routine use of the device. RESULTS: After confirming that no suitable marketed device was available, risk-based design and manufacturing approaches were used to safeguard in-house development. Verifications of material, manufacturing, mechanical safety, cleaning and sterilisation, use and workflow, and compatibility with procedures showed compliance with GSPRs. Simulated dosimetric benefits were observed compared to marketed devices. CONCLUSION: The ARCHITECT applicator was developed in a systematic process, resulting in documented workflows and verification steps. Our approach provides a practical framework for MDR-compliant introduction of in-house equipment and can inform future best practice guidelines.

Physica MedicaVol. 145
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KWF Kankerbestrijding
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.