Routine transfusion of Rh(D)‐positive <scp>RBCs</scp> to Rh(D)‐negative patients designated as do not resuscitate conserves Rh(D)‐negative red blood cell inventory

BACKGROUND: A minority of blood donors are Rh(D)-negative, and Rh(D)-negative red blood cell (RBC) products are often overutilized. As such, Rh(D)-negative RBCs may be difficult to maintain in blood bank inventory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We changed our blood bank laboratory policy to approve non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients to receive Rh(D)-positive RBCs for routine transfusion under defined criteria. Those criteria included Rh(D)-negative males (all ages) and females (aged >50 years) who were designated as do not resuscitate (DNR), either with or without intubation, in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: From August 15, 2024 through August 15, 2025, a total of 204 Rh(D)-negative patients met the above criteria and were approved to receive routine Rh(D)-positive RBC transfusions. Within that group, 23 patients received Rh(D)-positive RBCs. The remaining patients either did not require transfusion or were issued Rh(D)-negative RBC units. Since implementing this practice, a total of 68 Rh(D)-negative units were conserved during this time frame. Notably, 28 of the 68 units (41%) were type O, Rh(D)-negative. DISCUSSION: Rh(D)-positive RBCs can be routinely given to non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients who are not at risk for developing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). By creating clear guidelines for the routine administration of Rh(D)-positive RBCs to patients who are not at risk for HDFN, the inventory of Rh(D)-negative RBC units can be directed to those patients who would most benefit from this limited resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70209
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine transfusion of Rh(D)‐positive RBCs to Rh(D)‐negative patients designated as do not resuscitate conserves Rh(D)‐negative red blood cell inventory

Julie Katz Karp, Juliana Guarente, Mary Harach, Angelica Vivero et al.
Transfusion
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Routine transfusion of Rh(D)‐positive RBCs to Rh(D)‐negative patients designated as do not resuscitate conserves Rh(D)‐negative red blood cell inventory

Julie Katz Karp, Juliana Guarente, Mary Harach, Angelica Vivero, Jovanna N. Everetts, Tiffany Bohr
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A minority of blood donors are Rh(D)-negative, and Rh(D)-negative red blood cell (RBC) products are often overutilized. As such, Rh(D)-negative RBCs may be difficult to maintain in blood bank inventory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We changed our blood bank laboratory policy to approve non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients to receive Rh(D)-positive RBCs for routine transfusion under defined criteria. Those criteria included Rh(D)-negative males (all ages) and females (aged >50 years) who were designated as do not resuscitate (DNR), either with or without intubation, in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: From August 15, 2024 through August 15, 2025, a total of 204 Rh(D)-negative patients met the above criteria and were approved to receive routine Rh(D)-positive RBC transfusions. Within that group, 23 patients received Rh(D)-positive RBCs. The remaining patients either did not require transfusion or were issued Rh(D)-negative RBC units. Since implementing this practice, a total of 68 Rh(D)-negative units were conserved during this time frame. Notably, 28 of the 68 units (41%) were type O, Rh(D)-negative. DISCUSSION: Rh(D)-positive RBCs can be routinely given to non-alloimmunized Rh(D)-negative patients who are not at risk for developing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). By creating clear guidelines for the routine administration of Rh(D)-positive RBCs to patients who are not at risk for HDFN, the inventory of Rh(D)-negative RBC units can be directed to those patients who would most benefit from this limited resource.

Transfusion
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.