Understanding Preference Heterogeneity in Digital Neurorehabilitation: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment

OBJECTIVES: Increasing demand, rising costs, and limited access pose major challenges for stroke rehabilitation. Digital interventions offer solutions, although acceptance varies. Understanding heterogeneity in preferences and decision consistency is essential. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (N = 1055 after data cleaning) assessed preferences for 7 attributes. Latent class analysis identified preference-based subgroups; a heteroscedastic conditional logit model examined scale heterogeneity. RESULTS: = 3.909; P < .001) and higher digital affinity. Class 3 (46.5%) valued professional contact (β = 0.941; P < .001), location flexibility (β = 0.632; P < .001), and progress feedback (β = 0.558; P < .001), reflecting differentiated engagement preferences. The heteroscedastic conditional logit model showed that satisfaction with health (γ = 0.114; P < .001) and quality of life (γ = 0.043; P < .001) were linked to greater consistency, whereas (very) good health status (γ = -0.177; P < .001) and therapy experience (γ = -0.014; P < .001) corresponded to increased variability. CONCLUSION: Tailored interventions should reflect distinct preference types to foster acceptance. Cost-sensitive users may need simple formats; digitally engaged individuals benefit from flexible solutions; and those with inconsistent decisions may require clearer guidance or structured onboarding. Conducted in stroke rehabilitation, the study also captured broader rehabilitation experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Value in Health
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2026.03.2238
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Preference Heterogeneity in Digital Neurorehabilitation: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment

Thomas Kohlmann, Axel Christian Mühlbacher, Ann-Kathrin Fischer, Andrew Sadler
Value in Health
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Understanding Preference Heterogeneity in Digital Neurorehabilitation: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment

Thomas Kohlmann, Axel Christian Mühlbacher, Ann-Kathrin Fischer, Andrew Sadler
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Increasing demand, rising costs, and limited access pose major challenges for stroke rehabilitation. Digital interventions offer solutions, although acceptance varies. Understanding heterogeneity in preferences and decision consistency is essential. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (N = 1055 after data cleaning) assessed preferences for 7 attributes. Latent class analysis identified preference-based subgroups; a heteroscedastic conditional logit model examined scale heterogeneity. RESULTS: = 3.909; P < .001) and higher digital affinity. Class 3 (46.5%) valued professional contact (β = 0.941; P < .001), location flexibility (β = 0.632; P < .001), and progress feedback (β = 0.558; P < .001), reflecting differentiated engagement preferences. The heteroscedastic conditional logit model showed that satisfaction with health (γ = 0.114; P < .001) and quality of life (γ = 0.043; P < .001) were linked to greater consistency, whereas (very) good health status (γ = -0.177; P < .001) and therapy experience (γ = -0.014; P < .001) corresponded to increased variability. CONCLUSION: Tailored interventions should reflect distinct preference types to foster acceptance. Cost-sensitive users may need simple formats; digitally engaged individuals benefit from flexible solutions; and those with inconsistent decisions may require clearer guidance or structured onboarding. Conducted in stroke rehabilitation, the study also captured broader rehabilitation experience.

Value in Health
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), empirica - Communication and Technology Research (DE), Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Europäischer Sozialfonds
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.