Influence of different therapy strategies in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) on overall survival with regard to different decades: data from the German MDS registry

Over the history of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), an increasing number of treatment modalities have become available. It is therefore important to assess whether these developments have translated into improved overall survival (OS) for patients. We analyzed data from 1,147 patients in the German MDS registry and observed a progressive improvement in median survival across three diagnostic periods: until 2000 (20 months), 2001-2010 (31 months), and after 2011 (57 months). Patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) had the best prognosis with a median survival of 108 months. Over time, both the proportion of patients undergoing allogeneic SCT (6.3% vs. 22.1% vs. 40.0%) and the median age at transplantation (36.5 vs. 52 vs. 61 years) increased. Notably, OS also improved among patients treated with best supportive care (BSC) alone (17 vs. 31 vs. 64 months; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the period of first diagnosis had an independent positive effect on survival. The underlying reasons for this improvement remain unclear, but a multifactorial origin-including improved supportive measures and greater eligibility for allogeneic SCT-must be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hematology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-06736-4
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of different therapy strategies in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) on overall survival with regard to different decades: data from the German MDS registry

Stefani Parmentier, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Jonas Welsch, Arnd Nusch et al.
Annals of Hematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Influence of different therapy strategies in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) on overall survival with regard to different decades: data from the German MDS registry

Stefani Parmentier, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Jonas Welsch, Arnd Nusch, Annika Kasprzak, Katharina S. S. Götze, Felicitas Schulz, Carlo Aul, J. Lipke, Ulrich Germing, Sascha Dietrich, Corinna Strupp, Norbert Gattermann, Guido Kobbe
article en

Abstract

Over the history of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), an increasing number of treatment modalities have become available. It is therefore important to assess whether these developments have translated into improved overall survival (OS) for patients. We analyzed data from 1,147 patients in the German MDS registry and observed a progressive improvement in median survival across three diagnostic periods: until 2000 (20 months), 2001-2010 (31 months), and after 2011 (57 months). Patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) had the best prognosis with a median survival of 108 months. Over time, both the proportion of patients undergoing allogeneic SCT (6.3% vs. 22.1% vs. 40.0%) and the median age at transplantation (36.5 vs. 52 vs. 61 years) increased. Notably, OS also improved among patients treated with best supportive care (BSC) alone (17 vs. 31 vs. 64 months; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the period of first diagnosis had an independent positive effect on survival. The underlying reasons for this improvement remain unclear, but a multifactorial origin-including improved supportive measures and greater eligibility for allogeneic SCT-must be considered.

Annals of HematologyVol. 105(5)
TUM Klinikum (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Klinikum Dortmund (DE), St. Claraspital (CH), St.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Technische Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.