Breast MRI biomarkers of tumor biology: integrating imaging with pathology to guide clinical care

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is biologically heterogeneous, and tissue biomarkers derived from core biopsy may be limited by sampling and spatial heterogeneity. Breast MRI provides multiparametric information on tumor morphology, enhancement behavior, and peritumoral tissue characteristics. We evaluated whether standardized BI-RADS MRI descriptors are independently associated with histopathological features, immunohistochemical markers, and molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 340 consecutive women with invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type or invasive lobular carcinoma who underwent pretreatment 3T breast MRI between 2014 and 2019. MRI features were assessed using the BI-RADS MRI lexicon by a single experienced breast radiologist (>20 years), blinded to pathological data. Imaging descriptors were correlated with histological grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and immunohistochemistry-defined molecular subtypes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent imaging predictors. RESULTS: In multivariable models, peritumoral edema independently predicted LVI (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.18-3.81) and high proliferative activity (Ki-67 ≥ 20%; OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.89-4.83). T2 mixed/hyperintense signal independently predicted high Ki-67 (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.47-4.85) and HER2 positivity (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.72-5.66). Rim enhancement was independently associated with the triple-negative subtype (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.48-9.94) and high Ki-67 (OR 4.12, 95% CI 2.03-8.36). Washout kinetics independently predicted high Ki-67 (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.82-5.56) and were inversely associated with Luminal A tumors (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.37). HER2 positivity was independently associated with peritumoral edema, T2 hyperintensity, plateau kinetics, non-mass enhancement (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.56), and segmental non-mass distribution (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.12-9.61). Across analyses, a consistent imaging pattern combining edema, T2 hyperintensity, rim enhancement, and washout kinetics clustered in biologically aggressive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized BI-RADS breast MRI descriptors demonstrate consistent and independent associations with established pathological biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Although MRI does not replace tissue-based assessment, these imaging phenotypes may provide complementary biological context and support radiopathological correlation in multidisciplinary care. Given the retrospective, single-center design with single-reader assessment and absence of external validation, these findings should be interpreted with appropriate caution and require prospective multicenter confirmation before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112863
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast MRI biomarkers of tumor biology: integrating imaging with pathology to guide clinical care

Henrique Lima Couto, Dênia Reis de Paula, Ana Beatriz da Silva Pina, Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa et al.
European Journal of Radiology
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Breast MRI biomarkers of tumor biology: integrating imaging with pathology to guide clinical care

Henrique Lima Couto, Dênia Reis de Paula, Ana Beatriz da Silva Pina, Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa, Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahás, Benedito de Souza Almeida Filho, Heloisa Maria de Luca Vespolli, Carla Priscila Kamyia Carvalho Pessoa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is biologically heterogeneous, and tissue biomarkers derived from core biopsy may be limited by sampling and spatial heterogeneity. Breast MRI provides multiparametric information on tumor morphology, enhancement behavior, and peritumoral tissue characteristics. We evaluated whether standardized BI-RADS MRI descriptors are independently associated with histopathological features, immunohistochemical markers, and molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 340 consecutive women with invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type or invasive lobular carcinoma who underwent pretreatment 3T breast MRI between 2014 and 2019. MRI features were assessed using the BI-RADS MRI lexicon by a single experienced breast radiologist (>20 years), blinded to pathological data. Imaging descriptors were correlated with histological grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and immunohistochemistry-defined molecular subtypes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent imaging predictors. RESULTS: In multivariable models, peritumoral edema independently predicted LVI (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.18-3.81) and high proliferative activity (Ki-67 ≥ 20%; OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.89-4.83). T2 mixed/hyperintense signal independently predicted high Ki-67 (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.47-4.85) and HER2 positivity (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.72-5.66). Rim enhancement was independently associated with the triple-negative subtype (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.48-9.94) and high Ki-67 (OR 4.12, 95% CI 2.03-8.36). Washout kinetics independently predicted high Ki-67 (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.82-5.56) and were inversely associated with Luminal A tumors (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.37). HER2 positivity was independently associated with peritumoral edema, T2 hyperintensity, plateau kinetics, non-mass enhancement (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.56), and segmental non-mass distribution (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.12-9.61). Across analyses, a consistent imaging pattern combining edema, T2 hyperintensity, rim enhancement, and washout kinetics clustered in biologically aggressive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized BI-RADS breast MRI descriptors demonstrate consistent and independent associations with established pathological biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Although MRI does not replace tissue-based assessment, these imaging phenotypes may provide complementary biological context and support radiopathological correlation in multidisciplinary care. Given the retrospective, single-center design with single-reader assessment and absence of external validation, these findings should be interpreted with appropriate caution and require prospective multicenter confirmation before clinical implementation.

European Journal of RadiologyVol. 200
Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.