Goals of care and palliative care practices in critically ill patients: A multicentre, binational, point prevalence study

BACKGROUND: There are limited cross-sectional data regarding goals of care documentation and palliative care practices in intensive care units (ICUs). This point prevalence study describes documentation of goals of care, approach to limitation of life-sustaining therapies, and palliative care practices in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. OBJECTIVES: (i) to describe documentation of goals of care of patients in the ICU and (ii) to describe palliative care practices in the ICU. METHODS: multicentre, binational, point prevalence study was conducted. All adult patients admitted to 49 participating ICUs at a prespecified date and time were identified and followed up for 24 h. Primary outcome measures were documentation of goals of care, treatment limitations, and palliative care practices. RESULTS/FINDINGS: 649 patients were observed from 49 participating ICUs. Goals of care were documented in 444 out of 649 (68%) patients, with 74% (327/444) of these patients for full active management. Ninety-six patients (21%) were for active management with limitation of life-sustaining therapies, and 21 (5%) patients were for palliative care only. The most frequently withheld treatments were cardiopulmonary resuscitation (90%, 86/96), followed by invasive ventilation (50%, 48/96). ICU mortality was highest in patients who received palliative care only (71%, 15/21), followed by those who were for active management with limitation of life-sustaining therapies (27%, 26/96). Twenty-six (8%) patients who were for full active management died in the ICU. Among the patients who were for palliative care only, analgesics and sedatives were administered in 67% and 52% of these patients, respectively. Of the 49 participating ICUs, 29 (59%) had a defined policy or protocol for bereavement follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients admitted to the ICU did not have goals of care documented on the study day. Most patients were discharged alive from the ICU. Withholding of certain life-sustaining therapies was associated with increased mortality. Patients who received palliative care in the ICU were provided with symptom management, and bereavement follow-up was provided in two-thirds of participating ICUs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Critical Care
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2026.101582
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goals of care and palliative care practices in critically ill patients: A multicentre, binational, point prevalence study

Nikki Yeo, B. A. J. Reddi, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Adam M. Deane et al.
Australian Critical Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Goals of care and palliative care practices in critically ill patients: A multicentre, binational, point prevalence study

Nikki Yeo, B. A. J. Reddi, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Adam M. Deane, Manoj Saxena, John L. Moran
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited cross-sectional data regarding goals of care documentation and palliative care practices in intensive care units (ICUs). This point prevalence study describes documentation of goals of care, approach to limitation of life-sustaining therapies, and palliative care practices in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. OBJECTIVES: (i) to describe documentation of goals of care of patients in the ICU and (ii) to describe palliative care practices in the ICU. METHODS: multicentre, binational, point prevalence study was conducted. All adult patients admitted to 49 participating ICUs at a prespecified date and time were identified and followed up for 24 h. Primary outcome measures were documentation of goals of care, treatment limitations, and palliative care practices. RESULTS/FINDINGS: 649 patients were observed from 49 participating ICUs. Goals of care were documented in 444 out of 649 (68%) patients, with 74% (327/444) of these patients for full active management. Ninety-six patients (21%) were for active management with limitation of life-sustaining therapies, and 21 (5%) patients were for palliative care only. The most frequently withheld treatments were cardiopulmonary resuscitation (90%, 86/96), followed by invasive ventilation (50%, 48/96). ICU mortality was highest in patients who received palliative care only (71%, 15/21), followed by those who were for active management with limitation of life-sustaining therapies (27%, 26/96). Twenty-six (8%) patients who were for full active management died in the ICU. Among the patients who were for palliative care only, analgesics and sedatives were administered in 67% and 52% of these patients, respectively. Of the 49 participating ICUs, 29 (59%) had a defined policy or protocol for bereavement follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients admitted to the ICU did not have goals of care documented on the study day. Most patients were discharged alive from the ICU. Withholding of certain life-sustaining therapies was associated with increased mortality. Patients who received palliative care in the ICU were provided with symptom management, and bereavement follow-up was provided in two-thirds of participating ICUs.

Australian Critical CareVol. 39(3)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Saint Louis University Hospital (US), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), St George Hospital (AU), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.