Bone Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Conventional Methods to <scp>AI</scp> ‐Driven Solutions

With global population aging and increased life expectancy, bone diseases affect a substantial proportion of individuals worldwide, imposing a significant socioeconomic burden. Although X-ray-based imaging techniques remain the clinical standard for bone assessment, they are constrained by ionizing radiation exposure and poor soft-tissue contrast. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a promising radiation-free alternative, enabling detailed evaluation of tissue properties, bone microstructure, functional status, and pathological changes. However, the intrinsically low proton density and rapid transverse relaxation of bone tissue present fundamental technical challenges. Over the past decades, numerous MRI-based techniques have been developed to address these limitations. Yet, the literature remains fragmented. This review synthesizes recent advancements in bone MRI, covering conventional sequences (e.g., T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging), advanced sequences (e.g., ultrashort echo time and zero echo time), metabolic imaging sequences (e.g., magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI), and hardware innovations (e.g., ultra-high-field MRI at 7/14 T). The strengths and limitations of these techniques are discussed, and their roles are highlighted in early diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, and management of diverse bone disorders, including osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, osteosarcoma, and osteonecrosis. Furthermore, we explore how artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning models, enhances MRI capabilities by reducing scanning time, adding synthetic contrasts like synthetic CT, improving image quality, and increasing diagnostic accuracy. Finally, we outline challenges and future directions to advance bone assessment. This comprehensive review may guide preclinical research and accelerate clinical translation of bone MRI techniques, ultimately improving musculoskeletal disease management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.