Verification of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) in the older Chinese adults

This study aimed to adapt the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties in the older adult population, addressing the lack of a validated assessment tool. Utilizing convenience sampling, the research recruited 940 older adults (51.8% male, 48.2% female, mean age = 71.07 years). The original scale underwent cultural adaptation and linguistic translation, and its psychometric properties were rigorously evaluated through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and assessments of internal consistency reliability. The results demonstrated that the Chinese EBA-q successfully replicated the original scale’s four‑factor dimensional structure (Visuo‑tactile awareness, Spatial coordination, Awareness of body changes, and Awareness of clothing fit). Model comparisons indicated that a correlated four‑factor model provided a better fit in older Chinese adults than the bifactor structure proposed in the original study, possibly reflecting cultural or developmental distinctions. The scale exhibited excellent internal consistency and established measurement invariance across gender and region. In conclusion, the Chinese EBA‑q exhibits robust reliability and validity. The adapted scale is thus a suitable tool for assessing exteroceptive body awareness in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04451-3
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) in the older Chinese adults

Lina Meng, Qi Xin, Yixian Lei, Linyan Xu et al.
BMC Psychology
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Verification of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) in the older Chinese adults

Lina Meng, Qi Xin, Yixian Lei, Linyan Xu, Yuanting Cai
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties in the older adult population, addressing the lack of a validated assessment tool. Utilizing convenience sampling, the research recruited 940 older adults (51.8% male, 48.2% female, mean age = 71.07 years). The original scale underwent cultural adaptation and linguistic translation, and its psychometric properties were rigorously evaluated through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and assessments of internal consistency reliability. The results demonstrated that the Chinese EBA-q successfully replicated the original scale’s four‑factor dimensional structure (Visuo‑tactile awareness, Spatial coordination, Awareness of body changes, and Awareness of clothing fit). Model comparisons indicated that a correlated four‑factor model provided a better fit in older Chinese adults than the bifactor structure proposed in the original study, possibly reflecting cultural or developmental distinctions. The scale exhibited excellent internal consistency and established measurement invariance across gender and region. In conclusion, the Chinese EBA‑q exhibits robust reliability and validity. The adapted scale is thus a suitable tool for assessing exteroceptive body awareness in this population.

BMC Psychology
Harbin Medical University (CN), Lishui University (CN), Daqing City People's Hospital (CN), Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA), Education Department of Heilongjiang Province (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.