Concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion during cardiac surgery: a single-center case series on technique profile, residual flow, and early safety

Concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion is increasingly performed during cardiac surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, real-world data on procedural variations, closure integrity, and early safety are limited. We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion during cardiac surgery at a single center between 2012 and 2025. Nineteen patients underwent left atrial appendage occlusion using suture-based techniques or a closure device, and 67 underwent left atrial appendage resection with closure using sutures or a stapler. Residual flow was assessed using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and outcomes were evaluated during follow-up. Patients in the occlusion group more often had longer atrial fibrillation duration, vitamin K antagonist use, and previous cardiac surgery. Mitral valve procedures were more frequently combined with occlusion, whereas maze ablation was more common in the resection group. Intraoperative residual flow was detected in three patients (16%) after occlusion and in none after resection. Both approaches showed favorable early safety, with no 30-day mortality and low reoperation rates due to bleeding. Differences in sinus rhythm and anticoagulation at three months were observed, but were likely influenced by concomitant maze procedures. Differences in long-term survival were also observed but should be interpreted cautiously because of baseline imbalances and unequal follow-up duration. In this single-center retrospective case series, suture-based occlusion was associated with residual flow in a subset of patients, whereas no residual flow was detected after resection using intraoperative echocardiography. Both approaches showed acceptable early safety. Larger multicenter studies with standardized follow-up imaging are needed to clarify closure durability and the long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04017-9
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion during cardiac surgery: a single-center case series on technique profile, residual flow, and early safety

Hideki Tsubota, Masanori Honda, Masafumi Kudo, Hitoshi Okabayashi et al.
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion during cardiac surgery: a single-center case series on technique profile, residual flow, and early safety

Hideki Tsubota, Masanori Honda, Masafumi Kudo, Hitoshi Okabayashi, Yuki Akaguma
article en

Abstract

Concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion is increasingly performed during cardiac surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, real-world data on procedural variations, closure integrity, and early safety are limited. We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion during cardiac surgery at a single center between 2012 and 2025. Nineteen patients underwent left atrial appendage occlusion using suture-based techniques or a closure device, and 67 underwent left atrial appendage resection with closure using sutures or a stapler. Residual flow was assessed using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and outcomes were evaluated during follow-up. Patients in the occlusion group more often had longer atrial fibrillation duration, vitamin K antagonist use, and previous cardiac surgery. Mitral valve procedures were more frequently combined with occlusion, whereas maze ablation was more common in the resection group. Intraoperative residual flow was detected in three patients (16%) after occlusion and in none after resection. Both approaches showed favorable early safety, with no 30-day mortality and low reoperation rates due to bleeding. Differences in sinus rhythm and anticoagulation at three months were observed, but were likely influenced by concomitant maze procedures. Differences in long-term survival were also observed but should be interpreted cautiously because of baseline imbalances and unequal follow-up duration. In this single-center retrospective case series, suture-based occlusion was associated with residual flow in a subset of patients, whereas no residual flow was detected after resection using intraoperative echocardiography. Both approaches showed acceptable early safety. Larger multicenter studies with standardized follow-up imaging are needed to clarify closure durability and the long-term clinical outcomes.

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.