AI Agents and the Future of Deliberation: Designing Human–AI Collaboration for Democratic Dialogue

As societies grapple with increasing polarization and information complexity, the need for constructive, inclusive, and well-informed deliberation has reached an unparalleled level. At the same time, AI agents, ranging from LLMs and multi-agent simulations and systems to conversational assistants and reflective companions, are rapidly reshaping how people communicate, reason together, and form collective judgments. These technologies hold the potential to scale democratic participation, foster inclusivity by bridging linguistic and cultural barriers, and introduce new forms of collaborative reasoning. Yet they also pose epistemic challenges to established notions of authenticity, legitimacy, and human autonomy in civic dialogue. This panel brings together leading researchers from Asia, Europe and North America to examine how AI technologies are transforming deliberation as both a social process and a design problem. It interrogates AI’s role in shaping deliberative norms, influencing group dynamics, and redefining what it means to “reason together” in hybrid human–AI spaces. Through interactive polling, structured debates, and audience co-deliberation, the session invites CHI participants to collectively explore how we can design responsible, inclusive, and trustworthy deliberation interfaces that preserve the democratic values of deliberation while embracing the creative potential of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3790075
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Agents and the Future of Deliberation: Designing Human–AI Collaboration for Democratic Dialogue

Horacio Saggion, Jiaxin Pei, Anna De Liddo, Simon T. Perrault et al.
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Agents and the Future of Deliberation: Designing Human–AI Collaboration for Democratic Dialogue

Horacio Saggion, Jiaxin Pei, Anna De Liddo, Simon T. Perrault, Weiyu Zhang, Maurice Flechtner, ShunYi Yeo, Francesco Veri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As societies grapple with increasing polarization and information complexity, the need for constructive, inclusive, and well-informed deliberation has reached an unparalleled level. At the same time, AI agents, ranging from LLMs and multi-agent simulations and systems to conversational assistants and reflective companions, are rapidly reshaping how people communicate, reason together, and form collective judgments. These technologies hold the potential to scale democratic participation, foster inclusivity by bridging linguistic and cultural barriers, and introduce new forms of collaborative reasoning. Yet they also pose epistemic challenges to established notions of authenticity, legitimacy, and human autonomy in civic dialogue. This panel brings together leading researchers from Asia, Europe and North America to examine how AI technologies are transforming deliberation as both a social process and a design problem. It interrogates AI’s role in shaping deliberative norms, influencing group dynamics, and redefining what it means to “reason together” in hybrid human–AI spaces. Through interactive polling, structured debates, and audience co-deliberation, the session invites CHI participants to collectively explore how we can design responsible, inclusive, and trustworthy deliberation interfaces that preserve the democratic values of deliberation while embracing the creative potential of AI.

Télécom Paris (FR), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), National University of Singapore (SG), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Palo Alto University (US), University of Zurich (CH), The Open University (GB), Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l’Information (FR), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.