Neighbourhood Demographic Quotas and Limits of the Right to Sort

This article offers a normative defence of using neighbourhood demographic quotas to deconcentrate residential clusters of advantage. It develops the case by detailing problems of inequality that arise from this kind of sorting and sketching several ways to implement quotas in residential areas. Then it challenges several objections that might support advantaged individuals establishing or maintaining sorted neighbourhoods. It does this by conceptualising a ‘right to sort’ and critically investigating possible bases for it grounded in concerns regarding residential choice, freedom of association, located life plans, and non-discrimination. It furthers its defence of limiting the rights of advantaged individuals to sort by relating the discussion to ideas about the weight of certain moral claims varying in accordance with individuals’ broader circumstances in recent thinking on the relationship between domains of morality and principles of transitional justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Philosophy
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/pp.25789
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighbourhood Demographic Quotas and Limits of the Right to Sort

Andrew Walton
Political Philosophy
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

Neighbourhood Demographic Quotas and Limits of the Right to Sort

Andrew Walton
article en

Abstract

This article offers a normative defence of using neighbourhood demographic quotas to deconcentrate residential clusters of advantage. It develops the case by detailing problems of inequality that arise from this kind of sorting and sketching several ways to implement quotas in residential areas. Then it challenges several objections that might support advantaged individuals establishing or maintaining sorted neighbourhoods. It does this by conceptualising a ‘right to sort’ and critically investigating possible bases for it grounded in concerns regarding residential choice, freedom of association, located life plans, and non-discrimination. It furthers its defence of limiting the rights of advantaged individuals to sort by relating the discussion to ideas about the weight of certain moral claims varying in accordance with individuals’ broader circumstances in recent thinking on the relationship between domains of morality and principles of transitional justice.

Political PhilosophyVol. 3(1)
University of Zurich (CH), Newcastle University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.