“A comparison of pre-operative urine culture with intra-operative stone culture and its association with post-procedural sepsis: a prospective observational study”

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background and Aim:</bold> Urosepsis is a dreaded complication following endourological procedures. Urinary calculi are known to harbour bacteria that may be released into the circulation during fragmentation, potentially leading to urosepsis. Thus, urosepsis may develop despite a sterile pre-operative mid-stream urine (MSU) culture. Stone culture is not routinely performed in endourological practice. This study aimed to evaluate (i) the relationship between pre-operative MSU culture and intra-operative stone culture, and (ii) their association with postoperative urosepsis. <bold>Materials and Methods:</bold> In this comparative observational study (March 2023 – May 2024), 143 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, or cystolithotripsy were evaluated. Pre-operative MSU cultures and intra-operative stone cultures were obtained and analysed for positivity, bacterial spectrum, and stone location. Postoperatively, all patients were monitored for sepsis, defined by standard Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria in the presence of infection. <bold>Results:</bold> MSU cultures were positive in 15 patients (10.5 %), whereas stone cultures were positive in 40 patients (28 %), a significantly higher rate (p = 0.03). Escherichia coli was the predominant pathogen in both MSU (73.3%) and stone cultures (50 %). Concordant growth was observed in only 4 of 55 cases (7.3%). Nine patients (6.3 %) developed postoperative sepsis: 7 of 40 with positive stone cultures versus 2 of 103 with negative stone cultures (p = 0.002). Pre-operative MSU culture status was not significantly associated with sepsis (p = 0.24). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The microbiological profile of intra-operative stone cultures differs significantly from that of pre-operative MSU cultures. Stone culture is a better predictor of postoperative urosepsis and, when positive, may guide targeted antimicrobial therapy at minimal extra cost. Routine stone culture and sensitivity testing should therefore be incorporated into endourological stone surgery practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Urology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00606-1
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“A comparison of pre-operative urine culture with intra-operative stone culture and its association with post-procedural sepsis: a prospective observational study”

Sanjay Singh, Raja Ray, Debansu Sarkar
African Journal of Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

“A comparison of pre-operative urine culture with intra-operative stone culture and its association with post-procedural sepsis: a prospective observational study”

Sanjay Singh, Raja Ray, Debansu Sarkar
article en

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background and Aim:</bold> Urosepsis is a dreaded complication following endourological procedures. Urinary calculi are known to harbour bacteria that may be released into the circulation during fragmentation, potentially leading to urosepsis. Thus, urosepsis may develop despite a sterile pre-operative mid-stream urine (MSU) culture. Stone culture is not routinely performed in endourological practice. This study aimed to evaluate (i) the relationship between pre-operative MSU culture and intra-operative stone culture, and (ii) their association with postoperative urosepsis. <bold>Materials and Methods:</bold> In this comparative observational study (March 2023 – May 2024), 143 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, or cystolithotripsy were evaluated. Pre-operative MSU cultures and intra-operative stone cultures were obtained and analysed for positivity, bacterial spectrum, and stone location. Postoperatively, all patients were monitored for sepsis, defined by standard Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria in the presence of infection. <bold>Results:</bold> MSU cultures were positive in 15 patients (10.5 %), whereas stone cultures were positive in 40 patients (28 %), a significantly higher rate (p = 0.03). Escherichia coli was the predominant pathogen in both MSU (73.3%) and stone cultures (50 %). Concordant growth was observed in only 4 of 55 cases (7.3%). Nine patients (6.3 %) developed postoperative sepsis: 7 of 40 with positive stone cultures versus 2 of 103 with negative stone cultures (p = 0.002). Pre-operative MSU culture status was not significantly associated with sepsis (p = 0.24). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The microbiological profile of intra-operative stone cultures differs significantly from that of pre-operative MSU cultures. Stone culture is a better predictor of postoperative urosepsis and, when positive, may guide targeted antimicrobial therapy at minimal extra cost. Routine stone culture and sensitivity testing should therefore be incorporated into endourological stone surgery practices.

African Journal of UrologyVol. 32(1)
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.