Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Knee Lesions: Where Are We Now?

Globally, knee lesions, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), menisci, cartilage, and osteoarthritis, are a major clinical burden. Clinical examination and medical imaging are key diagnostic methods, but they are inaccurate, inefficient, and rarely reproducible. Musculoskeletal imaging diagnostic precision and workflows may improve with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. To comprehensively review AI and ML applications for knee lesion diagnosis, compare their diagnostic performance to conventional methods, and identify key challenges and future clinical directions, a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore for studies from 2015 to the present. Keywords included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "knee", "MRI", "diagnosis", and "lesion detection". Performance metrics, methodological rigor, and relevance to AI/ML knee lesion diagnosis were considered when selecting studies. Analyses included peer-reviewed articles and regulatory guidance. There were 14 AI/ML knee lesion diagnosis studies in the review. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most popular architecture, with ResNet, VGG, DenseNet, and custom architectures performing well. Deep learning models were accurate diagnostically. AI-assisted diagnosis excelled at ACL tear, osteoarthritis grading, and meniscal tear detection. AI systems outperformed radiologists in diagnostic accuracy, interpretation time, and inter-reader agreement. In many applications, AI and ML technologies can diagnose knee lesions with human-level accuracy. However, dataset diversity, model generalizability, regulatory approval, and clinical integration remain issues. Clinical deployment requires ongoing research on standardized protocols, diverse training datasets, and real-world validation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106869
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Knee Lesions: Where Are We Now?

Dimitrios Koulalis, Dimitrios Mastrokalos, Orestis Konstantas, Panagiotis Koulouvaris et al.
Cureus
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Knee Lesions: Where Are We Now?

Dimitrios Koulalis, Dimitrios Mastrokalos, Orestis Konstantas, Panagiotis Koulouvaris, Paraskevas-Asimakis Velitsikakis, Pavlos Altsitzioglou, Dimitrios Serenidis
article en

Abstract

Globally, knee lesions, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), menisci, cartilage, and osteoarthritis, are a major clinical burden. Clinical examination and medical imaging are key diagnostic methods, but they are inaccurate, inefficient, and rarely reproducible. Musculoskeletal imaging diagnostic precision and workflows may improve with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. To comprehensively review AI and ML applications for knee lesion diagnosis, compare their diagnostic performance to conventional methods, and identify key challenges and future clinical directions, a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore for studies from 2015 to the present. Keywords included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "deep learning", "knee", "MRI", "diagnosis", and "lesion detection". Performance metrics, methodological rigor, and relevance to AI/ML knee lesion diagnosis were considered when selecting studies. Analyses included peer-reviewed articles and regulatory guidance. There were 14 AI/ML knee lesion diagnosis studies in the review. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most popular architecture, with ResNet, VGG, DenseNet, and custom architectures performing well. Deep learning models were accurate diagnostically. AI-assisted diagnosis excelled at ACL tear, osteoarthritis grading, and meniscal tear detection. AI systems outperformed radiologists in diagnostic accuracy, interpretation time, and inter-reader agreement. In many applications, AI and ML technologies can diagnose knee lesions with human-level accuracy. However, dataset diversity, model generalizability, regulatory approval, and clinical integration remain issues. Clinical deployment requires ongoing research on standardized protocols, diverse training datasets, and real-world validation.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.