From frailty to decision: impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on surgical planning and outcomes in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies

Background: Frailty is a major determinant of postoperative morbidity, functional decline, and survival in older adults with cancer, yet it is not consistently integrated into oncologic surgical decision-making. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) provides a multidimensional evaluation of physiological reserve, functional status, and patient priorities; but, its influence on treatment planning and survival in surgical oncology remains incompletely defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥65 years referred for preoperative CGA between 2020 and 2023 at a dedicated geriatric surgery clinic within a large academic center. Patients were stratified by frailty status and CGA-derived clinical recommendation: Fit for Treatment, Prehabilitation & Surgery, or Other Intervention. Primary outcomes were modification of the initial treatment plan and overall survival. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 273 patients (median age 82 years; 42% female), treatment plans were modified in 21%, with modification rates increasing by frailty severity (non-frail 10%, mild-moderate 31%, severe 65%; p<0.001). Both frailty status and CGA recommendation independently predicted treatment-plan modification. Overall, 64% of patients underwent surgery, with marked variation by recommendation (Fit for Treatment 78%, Prehabilitation & Surgery 70%, Other Intervention 18%; p<0.001). Survival differed by frailty status (p=0.012) and CGA recommendation (p=0.008). In multivariable analysis, CGA recommendation was the strongest independent predictor of mortality, whereas frailty category was not independently associated with survival. Conclusion: CGA-derived recommendations substantially influenced surgical oncology treatment selection and were independently associated with survival, providing prognostic information beyond frailty status alone. Integrating CGA into preoperative surgical oncology workflows may support individualized, goal-concordant decision-making and help avoid potentially non-beneficial surgery in older adults with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1788002
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From frailty to decision: impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on surgical planning and outcomes in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies

Hanoch Kashtan, Laura Frain, Nadav Yehoshua Schacham, Lisa Cooper et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

From frailty to decision: impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on surgical planning and outcomes in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies

Hanoch Kashtan, Laura Frain, Nadav Yehoshua Schacham, Lisa Cooper, Niv Hagai, Adva Kuper, Saeed M. Naser, Mohammad Igbariya, Ran Orgad
article en

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a major determinant of postoperative morbidity, functional decline, and survival in older adults with cancer, yet it is not consistently integrated into oncologic surgical decision-making. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) provides a multidimensional evaluation of physiological reserve, functional status, and patient priorities; but, its influence on treatment planning and survival in surgical oncology remains incompletely defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥65 years referred for preoperative CGA between 2020 and 2023 at a dedicated geriatric surgery clinic within a large academic center. Patients were stratified by frailty status and CGA-derived clinical recommendation: Fit for Treatment, Prehabilitation & Surgery, or Other Intervention. Primary outcomes were modification of the initial treatment plan and overall survival. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 273 patients (median age 82 years; 42% female), treatment plans were modified in 21%, with modification rates increasing by frailty severity (non-frail 10%, mild-moderate 31%, severe 65%; p<0.001). Both frailty status and CGA recommendation independently predicted treatment-plan modification. Overall, 64% of patients underwent surgery, with marked variation by recommendation (Fit for Treatment 78%, Prehabilitation & Surgery 70%, Other Intervention 18%; p<0.001). Survival differed by frailty status (p=0.012) and CGA recommendation (p=0.008). In multivariable analysis, CGA recommendation was the strongest independent predictor of mortality, whereas frailty category was not independently associated with survival. Conclusion: CGA-derived recommendations substantially influenced surgical oncology treatment selection and were independently associated with survival, providing prognostic information beyond frailty status alone. Integrating CGA into preoperative surgical oncology workflows may support individualized, goal-concordant decision-making and help avoid potentially non-beneficial surgery in older adults with cancer.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Assuta Medical Center (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.