How do energy firms respond to climate risks? Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from Chinese listed energy firms

Climate change-induced risks have become an important factor shaping corporate investment behavior. We develop a theoretical model and employ text-based measures of climate transition and physical risks to investigate how these risks influence the investment decisions of Chinese energy firms. Our findings reveal that climate risks prompt energy firms to increase financial investment while discouraging real investment as a hedging strategy. Specifically, the increase in financial investment is concentrated in cash and short-term investments, whereas the decline in real investment is primarily reflected in irreversible fixed assets. Mechanism analysis shows that financing constraints intensify the effect of climate risks, while better ESG performance buffers the impact of climate transition risk. Furthermore, climate risks increase operational volatility, driving firms to leverage financial assets to mitigate default risk. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that these impacts vary significantly across firm size and ownership structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.105254
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do energy firms respond to climate risks? Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from Chinese listed energy firms

Zhilei Pan, Wenqiang Zhu, Sitong Yang, Shouwei Li
International Review of Economics & Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How do energy firms respond to climate risks? Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from Chinese listed energy firms

Zhilei Pan, Wenqiang Zhu, Sitong Yang, Shouwei Li
article en

Abstract

Climate change-induced risks have become an important factor shaping corporate investment behavior. We develop a theoretical model and employ text-based measures of climate transition and physical risks to investigate how these risks influence the investment decisions of Chinese energy firms. Our findings reveal that climate risks prompt energy firms to increase financial investment while discouraging real investment as a hedging strategy. Specifically, the increase in financial investment is concentrated in cash and short-term investments, whereas the decline in real investment is primarily reflected in irreversible fixed assets. Mechanism analysis shows that financing constraints intensify the effect of climate risks, while better ESG performance buffers the impact of climate transition risk. Furthermore, climate risks increase operational volatility, driving firms to leverage financial assets to mitigate default risk. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that these impacts vary significantly across firm size and ownership structure.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 108
Yunnan University of Finance And Economics (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.