Does laser delivery mode matter? Corneal sensitivity and ocular surface changes after single-spot and multispot PRP in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), but it may alter corneal sensitivity and tear film stability through thermal and neuroinflammatory mechanisms. The recent introduction of pattern-scanning multispot systems allows shorter pulse durations and lower cumulative energy delivery. This study aimed to evaluate pre- and post-treatment changes in corneal sensitivity and ocular surface parameters following single-spot and multispot PRP in patients with PDR. This retrospective observational study included 90 eyes from 45 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent PRP using either single-spot (n = 44) or multispot (n = 46) techniques. Corneal sensitivity (Cochet–Bonnet esthesiometer), tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, and corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford scale) were measured at baseline, and at 1 and 3 months after PRP. Repeated measures were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to account for inter-eye correlation, and multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors. In the single-spot PRP group, TBUT, Schirmer, and esthesiometry values significantly decreased at both 1 and 3 months compared with baseline (p < 0.05), while Oxford grading scores increased significantly (p < 0.05). In the multispot PRP group, TBUT values decreased at 1 month but showed no significant difference from baseline at 3 months, and esthesiometry values increased significantly at 3 months (p < 0.05). Total delivered energy was lower in the multispot group despite a higher number of laser burns (p < 0.001). Diabetes duration was independently associated with Schirmer test values at month 1 and Oxford grading scores at month 3 (p < 0.05). Both PRP techniques effectively treated PDR, but their effects on ocular surface parameters differed. Single-spot PRP resulted in a sustained reduction in corneal sensitivity and tear film stability, whereas changes after multispot PRP were transient and less pronounced. The multispot technique, characterized by shorter pulses and reduced cumulative energy, may therefore minimize anterior segment alterations associated with PRP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04806-9
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does laser delivery mode matter? Corneal sensitivity and ocular surface changes after single-spot and multispot PRP in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Şerife Çiloğlu Hayat, Merve Kelebek, Y Yilmaz
BMC Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Does laser delivery mode matter? Corneal sensitivity and ocular surface changes after single-spot and multispot PRP in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Şerife Çiloğlu Hayat, Merve Kelebek, Y Yilmaz
article en

Abstract

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), but it may alter corneal sensitivity and tear film stability through thermal and neuroinflammatory mechanisms. The recent introduction of pattern-scanning multispot systems allows shorter pulse durations and lower cumulative energy delivery. This study aimed to evaluate pre- and post-treatment changes in corneal sensitivity and ocular surface parameters following single-spot and multispot PRP in patients with PDR. This retrospective observational study included 90 eyes from 45 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent PRP using either single-spot (n = 44) or multispot (n = 46) techniques. Corneal sensitivity (Cochet–Bonnet esthesiometer), tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, and corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford scale) were measured at baseline, and at 1 and 3 months after PRP. Repeated measures were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to account for inter-eye correlation, and multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors. In the single-spot PRP group, TBUT, Schirmer, and esthesiometry values significantly decreased at both 1 and 3 months compared with baseline (p < 0.05), while Oxford grading scores increased significantly (p < 0.05). In the multispot PRP group, TBUT values decreased at 1 month but showed no significant difference from baseline at 3 months, and esthesiometry values increased significantly at 3 months (p < 0.05). Total delivered energy was lower in the multispot group despite a higher number of laser burns (p < 0.001). Diabetes duration was independently associated with Schirmer test values at month 1 and Oxford grading scores at month 3 (p < 0.05). Both PRP techniques effectively treated PDR, but their effects on ocular surface parameters differed. Single-spot PRP resulted in a sustained reduction in corneal sensitivity and tear film stability, whereas changes after multispot PRP were transient and less pronounced. The multispot technique, characterized by shorter pulses and reduced cumulative energy, may therefore minimize anterior segment alterations associated with PRP.

BMC Ophthalmology
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Affordable and clean energy, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.