AI4Deliberation_D1.1 – Demystify digital Deliberative Processes

This deliverable provides a basic foundation for future activities of the AI4Deliberation project, based on activities within WP1 - Demystify digital Deliberations tasks. By providing a comprehensive understanding of deliberation processes and their translation into the digital context, a starting point can be created that clarifies how AI-enabled tools can be meaningfully and sustainably integrated into these deliberation processes. In particular: Task 1.1 delivers a systematic literature review, examining the normative foundations of deliberation, the affordances and challenges of digital platforms, current tools on the market, and an assessment of potential use cases for AI to enhance processes. It also explores evaluation methods, the potential role of Argument Mining, institutional conditions, and best practices for integrating such technologies. Task 1.2 conducts a forward-looking technology foresight exercise using the Delphi method, identifying plausible future scenarios and socio-political shifts that mayshape the development and impact of digital deliberation technologies. Task 1.3 involves a comprehensive needs assessment based on surveys and interviews with stakeholders across diverse pilot contexts, producing key user insights, use cases, and a preliminary product backlog to guide a user-centered agile development. The synthesis of these three interlinked tasks of WP1, provides a strong basis for the development of corresponding AI tools, as we can be sure that they represent innovations, that they are strongly oriented towards the normative design principles of deliberative processes, that they can be set up in a crisis-proof manner and that they are not dictated from the ivory tower, but rather take the design recommendations of potential users and practitioners seriously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19541092
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI4Deliberation_D1.1 – Demystify digital Deliberative Processes

Andreas Jungherr, Dimitris Zeginis, Rafail Promikyridis, Yannick von Ostheim
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI4Deliberation_D1.1 – Demystify digital Deliberative Processes

Andreas Jungherr, Dimitris Zeginis, Rafail Promikyridis, Yannick von Ostheim
article en

Abstract

This deliverable provides a basic foundation for future activities of the AI4Deliberation project, based on activities within WP1 - Demystify digital Deliberations tasks. By providing a comprehensive understanding of deliberation processes and their translation into the digital context, a starting point can be created that clarifies how AI-enabled tools can be meaningfully and sustainably integrated into these deliberation processes. In particular: Task 1.1 delivers a systematic literature review, examining the normative foundations of deliberation, the affordances and challenges of digital platforms, current tools on the market, and an assessment of potential use cases for AI to enhance processes. It also explores evaluation methods, the potential role of Argument Mining, institutional conditions, and best practices for integrating such technologies. Task 1.2 conducts a forward-looking technology foresight exercise using the Delphi method, identifying plausible future scenarios and socio-political shifts that mayshape the development and impact of digital deliberation technologies. Task 1.3 involves a comprehensive needs assessment based on surveys and interviews with stakeholders across diverse pilot contexts, producing key user insights, use cases, and a preliminary product backlog to guide a user-centered agile development. The synthesis of these three interlinked tasks of WP1, provides a strong basis for the development of corresponding AI tools, as we can be sure that they represent innovations, that they are strongly oriented towards the normative design principles of deliberative processes, that they can be set up in a crisis-proof manner and that they are not dictated from the ivory tower, but rather take the design recommendations of potential users and practitioners seriously.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR), University of Bamberg (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.