Midblock Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crash Rates in Milwaukee, WI

Despite the majority of US fatal and severe pedestrian injuries occurring at midblock locations, few communities have collected counts to understand pedestrian midblock exposure and crash rates. This study developed a midblock pedestrian crossing count protocol and applied it to 61 street segments in the City of Milwaukee, WI. We counted midblock and adjacent intersection pedestrian crossings manually from 24-h video recordings. Midblock pedestrian crossings were common: 46 of the segments (75%) averaged more than one per hour. Among 48 segments with complete counts for both the midblock and an adjacent intersection crossing zone, 15 (31%) had more crossings in the midblock zone. We estimate that 17% of all pedestrian crossings along these 48 segments were midblock. Using these counts, we developed a negative binomial direct demand model of midblock pedestrian crossing volumes in Milwaukee. Midblock volumes were positively associated with nearby job density, commercial retail properties, and bus stops and negatively associated with posted speed limit and nearby parks. We demonstrated the value of this model by calculating pedestrian crash rates for all of our study segments and by estimating pedestrian crossing volumes for 133 additional street segments along seven roadway corridors. Expanding these methods beyond Milwaukee could lead to improved understanding of midblock pedestrian volumes and crash rates, ultimately helping communities reduce midblock pedestrian injuries and fatalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981261432582
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midblock Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crash Rates in Milwaukee, WI

Robert J. Schneider, Kyle Thorne, Henry Barbee, Carl Sveen et al.
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Midblock Pedestrian Crossing Volumes and Crash Rates in Milwaukee, WI

Robert J. Schneider, Kyle Thorne, Henry Barbee, Carl Sveen, Nathanael Hemze, Olanrewaju Emmanuel Ogunniyi
article en

Abstract

Despite the majority of US fatal and severe pedestrian injuries occurring at midblock locations, few communities have collected counts to understand pedestrian midblock exposure and crash rates. This study developed a midblock pedestrian crossing count protocol and applied it to 61 street segments in the City of Milwaukee, WI. We counted midblock and adjacent intersection pedestrian crossings manually from 24-h video recordings. Midblock pedestrian crossings were common: 46 of the segments (75%) averaged more than one per hour. Among 48 segments with complete counts for both the midblock and an adjacent intersection crossing zone, 15 (31%) had more crossings in the midblock zone. We estimate that 17% of all pedestrian crossings along these 48 segments were midblock. Using these counts, we developed a negative binomial direct demand model of midblock pedestrian crossing volumes in Milwaukee. Midblock volumes were positively associated with nearby job density, commercial retail properties, and bus stops and negatively associated with posted speed limit and nearby parks. We demonstrated the value of this model by calculating pedestrian crash rates for all of our study segments and by estimating pedestrian crossing volumes for 133 additional street segments along seven roadway corridors. Expanding these methods beyond Milwaukee could lead to improved understanding of midblock pedestrian volumes and crash rates, ultimately helping communities reduce midblock pedestrian injuries and fatalities.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.