Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Online Versus In‐Person Cognitive‐Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders

OBJECTIVE: This preliminary study investigated adolescent and young adult (AYA) perceptions of online cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for eating disorders (EDs), examining attitudes toward online versus face-to-face treatment and perceived effectiveness of online CBT interventions. METHOD: Of 258 patients contacted, 75 (29%) completed a survey and 54 (21%) were eligible for inclusion (83.3% female; mean age = 18.33 years), all of whom received telehealth services between March 2020 and December 2022. Measures assessed attitudes toward online and face-to-face counseling, satisfaction with online therapy, and perceived effectiveness of CBT interventions delivered online. Data were analyzed using t-tests, Pearson correlations, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Participants rated online CBT as significantly more valuable than face-to-face CBT (t(53) = 2.64, p = 0.011), with no differences in discomfort between modalities. Most participants (82.4%) reported satisfaction with online CBT, though preferences were split regarding continuing online versus in-person treatment. Proportion of previous online sessions was negatively correlated with perceived value of online counseling (r = -0.43, p = 0.001). Participants rated most CBT interventions as equally effective online, with highest ratings for meal planning (74.0%) and cognitive restructuring (71.7%), and lowest for open weighing (35.7%). DISCUSSION: Participants valued online CBT during the pandemic and viewed most CBT components as acceptable when delivered virtually, though individual preferences varied. Interventions requiring physical presence (e.g., open weighing) were perceived as less suitable for online delivery. While these preliminary findings suggest potential benefits of offering flexible treatment modalities, the low response rate limits generalizability and necessitates further research to examine the long-term viability of online CBT for AYAs with EDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70099
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Online Versus In‐Person Cognitive‐Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders

Jamal H. Essayli, Robert D. Friedberg, Marley G. Billman Miller, Ava Pasewicz
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Online Versus In‐Person Cognitive‐Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders

Jamal H. Essayli, Robert D. Friedberg, Marley G. Billman Miller, Ava Pasewicz
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This preliminary study investigated adolescent and young adult (AYA) perceptions of online cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for eating disorders (EDs), examining attitudes toward online versus face-to-face treatment and perceived effectiveness of online CBT interventions. METHOD: Of 258 patients contacted, 75 (29%) completed a survey and 54 (21%) were eligible for inclusion (83.3% female; mean age = 18.33 years), all of whom received telehealth services between March 2020 and December 2022. Measures assessed attitudes toward online and face-to-face counseling, satisfaction with online therapy, and perceived effectiveness of CBT interventions delivered online. Data were analyzed using t-tests, Pearson correlations, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Participants rated online CBT as significantly more valuable than face-to-face CBT (t(53) = 2.64, p = 0.011), with no differences in discomfort between modalities. Most participants (82.4%) reported satisfaction with online CBT, though preferences were split regarding continuing online versus in-person treatment. Proportion of previous online sessions was negatively correlated with perceived value of online counseling (r = -0.43, p = 0.001). Participants rated most CBT interventions as equally effective online, with highest ratings for meal planning (74.0%) and cognitive restructuring (71.7%), and lowest for open weighing (35.7%). DISCUSSION: Participants valued online CBT during the pandemic and viewed most CBT components as acceptable when delivered virtually, though individual preferences varied. Interventions requiring physical presence (e.g., open weighing) were perceived as less suitable for online delivery. While these preliminary findings suggest potential benefits of offering flexible treatment modalities, the low response rate limits generalizability and necessitates further research to examine the long-term viability of online CBT for AYAs with EDs.

International Journal of Eating Disorders
Pennsylvania State University (US), Independent Sector (US), Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas (US), Auburn University (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.