Ileocecal and Small Bowel Involvement Are Independently Associated with Inferior Survival Despite Complete Cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC–IV Tubo-Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Complete macroscopic tumor resection is the strongest prognostic factor in advanced epithelial tubo-ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer, yet benefit from maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery may vary with tumor distribution and site-specific resections. We aimed to identify predictors of long-term survival, considering postoperative morbidity, to inform preoperative stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study had a retrospective single-center cohort of 302 all-comers patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics/American Joint Committee on Cancer (FIGO/AJCC) IIIC-IV epithelial tubo-ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery in a European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO)-certified high-volume tertiary referral center (2006-2021). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression; progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses explored site-specific bowel resections. RESULTS: Complete resection was achieved in 259 (85.8%) patients, requiring high surgical complexity in 221 (73.2%, Surgical Complexity Score ≥ 8). Intestinal segment resections were performed in 71.5% of patients, including ileocecal resection in 24.5%. Large bowel resection (OR 2.708, p = 0.002) significantly increased major postoperative morbidity. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 6.0%, independent of transitory stoma formation (p = 0.759). Small bowel resection independently predicted impaired long-term survival (3-year OS 31.8% versus 57.0%, p < 0.001). Ileocecal resections were associated with poorest outcome (3-year OS 24.2%, p < 0.001). Complete macroscopic resection remained prognostically beneficial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (13.9%) and high surgical complexity did not negatively affect long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Ileocecal and small bowel involvement are independently associated with inferior survival despite complete cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC-IV disease. These findings support preoperative triage and counseling by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with selective consideration of primary systemic therapy with planned interval cytoreduction for extensive small bowel/ileocecal disease, particularly in frail or complex patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19485-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ileocecal and Small Bowel Involvement Are Independently Associated with Inferior Survival Despite Complete Cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC–IV Tubo-Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Davit Bokhua, Angela Kather, Clara Evangelia Goerdt, Ingo B. Runnebaum et al.
1 citations
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
26.65
article

Ileocecal and Small Bowel Involvement Are Independently Associated with Inferior Survival Despite Complete Cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC–IV Tubo-Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Davit Bokhua, Angela Kather, Clara Evangelia Goerdt, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Huyen Thi Thanh Nguyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete macroscopic tumor resection is the strongest prognostic factor in advanced epithelial tubo-ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer, yet benefit from maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery may vary with tumor distribution and site-specific resections. We aimed to identify predictors of long-term survival, considering postoperative morbidity, to inform preoperative stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study had a retrospective single-center cohort of 302 all-comers patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics/American Joint Committee on Cancer (FIGO/AJCC) IIIC-IV epithelial tubo-ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing maximum-effort cytoreductive surgery in a European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO)-certified high-volume tertiary referral center (2006-2021). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression; progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses explored site-specific bowel resections. RESULTS: Complete resection was achieved in 259 (85.8%) patients, requiring high surgical complexity in 221 (73.2%, Surgical Complexity Score ≥ 8). Intestinal segment resections were performed in 71.5% of patients, including ileocecal resection in 24.5%. Large bowel resection (OR 2.708, p = 0.002) significantly increased major postoperative morbidity. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 6.0%, independent of transitory stoma formation (p = 0.759). Small bowel resection independently predicted impaired long-term survival (3-year OS 31.8% versus 57.0%, p < 0.001). Ileocecal resections were associated with poorest outcome (3-year OS 24.2%, p < 0.001). Complete macroscopic resection remained prognostically beneficial. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (13.9%) and high surgical complexity did not negatively affect long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Ileocecal and small bowel involvement are independently associated with inferior survival despite complete cytoreduction in FIGO IIIC-IV disease. These findings support preoperative triage and counseling by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with selective consideration of primary systemic therapy with planned interval cytoreduction for extensive small bowel/ileocecal disease, particularly in frail or complex patients.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
Jena University Hospital (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
26.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.