Greenwashing in the digital age: transparency and sustainable corporate governance mechanisms

Purpose This study aims to address the fragmentation in research on greenwashing, transparency and digitalization by examining how these elements interact as governance mechanisms within sustainable corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach A PRISMA-based systematic literature review was conducted on 87 peer-reviewed articles published between 2017 and 2024 in Web of Science and Scopus. Explicit inclusion criteria were applied, and a theory-informed thematic synthesis identified governance mechanisms, institutional dynamics and digital accountability tools. Findings Substantive transparency reduces the prevalence and perception of greenwashing by strengthening accountability structures. Digitalization operates as an enabling but ambivalent governance infrastructure: technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and natural language processing enhance traceability and monitoring, yet may also enable more sophisticated symbolic practices when not embedded in robust regulatory and assurance systems. Greenwashing therefore emerges as a systemic governance challenge rather than merely a communication problem. Practical implications The findings provide guidance for boards, regulators and auditors in designing integrated transparency and oversight architecture. Originality/value Existing research treats these constructs in isolation, limiting explanatory integration and governance insight. The study advances theory by integrating transparency and digitalization into a unified governance framework, reconceptualizing greenwashing as a function of institutional design and monitoring capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2025-1039
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenwashing in the digital age: transparency and sustainable corporate governance mechanisms

Nataly Andrea Guiñez-Cabrera, Tomás Zapata-Soto
Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Greenwashing in the digital age: transparency and sustainable corporate governance mechanisms

Nataly Andrea Guiñez-Cabrera, Tomás Zapata-Soto
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to address the fragmentation in research on greenwashing, transparency and digitalization by examining how these elements interact as governance mechanisms within sustainable corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach A PRISMA-based systematic literature review was conducted on 87 peer-reviewed articles published between 2017 and 2024 in Web of Science and Scopus. Explicit inclusion criteria were applied, and a theory-informed thematic synthesis identified governance mechanisms, institutional dynamics and digital accountability tools. Findings Substantive transparency reduces the prevalence and perception of greenwashing by strengthening accountability structures. Digitalization operates as an enabling but ambivalent governance infrastructure: technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and natural language processing enhance traceability and monitoring, yet may also enable more sophisticated symbolic practices when not embedded in robust regulatory and assurance systems. Greenwashing therefore emerges as a systemic governance challenge rather than merely a communication problem. Practical implications The findings provide guidance for boards, regulators and auditors in designing integrated transparency and oversight architecture. Originality/value Existing research treats these constructs in isolation, limiting explanatory integration and governance insight. The study advances theory by integrating transparency and digitalization into a unified governance framework, reconceptualizing greenwashing as a function of institutional design and monitoring capacity.

Corporate Governance
University of Bío-Bío (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.