Rethinking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict Resolution and Nation-Building in Nigeria

Adedeji, A. O. Rethinking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict Resolution and Nation-Building in Nigeria Afrisophia: Journal of African Experiment, Thought and Experience, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19503236 Abstract The inadequacy of litigation in addressing the menace of conflict, which led to growing dissatisfaction with the system, coupled with a favourable political climate that sought alternative means of resolving disputes outside litigation, led to the resurgence of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) across the globe. This study interrogated the significance of ADR in conflict resolution and nation-building, focusing on its influence in achieving reconciliation and peace in Nigeria. The study adopted a quantitative research approach, relying on both primary and secondary methods of data collection and analysis. 200 copies of the questionnaire were administered to respondents, out of which 160 were retrieved. Analysis was carried out using inferential statistical tools in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 19) at a 0.05 level of significance. The study found that ADR offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, decongestion of courts, the promotion of social justice, and the provision of platforms for the amicable settlement of disputes that often produce win–win outcomes and reconciliation. Despite these benefits, its development is constrained by factors such as the absence of binding precedent, difficulties in balancing power relations between disputing parties, limited public sanction, and a shortage of skilled practitioners compounded by inadequate training. The study concludes that ADR is closely linked to reconciliation and peace, both of which are essential for nation-building. It therefore recommends sustained public enlightenment, improved planning and information management, the engagement of qualified personnel with adequate training, and increased funding for both public and private ADR centres. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Conflict, Conflict Resolution, Court System, Litigation, Nation-Building, Reconciliation, Peace

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19503236
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict Resolution and Nation-Building in Nigeria

Amos Ojo Adedeji
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Rethinking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict Resolution and Nation-Building in Nigeria

Amos Ojo Adedeji
article en

Abstract

Adedeji, A. O. Rethinking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict Resolution and Nation-Building in Nigeria Afrisophia: Journal of African Experiment, Thought and Experience, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19503236 Abstract The inadequacy of litigation in addressing the menace of conflict, which led to growing dissatisfaction with the system, coupled with a favourable political climate that sought alternative means of resolving disputes outside litigation, led to the resurgence of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) across the globe. This study interrogated the significance of ADR in conflict resolution and nation-building, focusing on its influence in achieving reconciliation and peace in Nigeria. The study adopted a quantitative research approach, relying on both primary and secondary methods of data collection and analysis. 200 copies of the questionnaire were administered to respondents, out of which 160 were retrieved. Analysis was carried out using inferential statistical tools in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 19) at a 0.05 level of significance. The study found that ADR offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, decongestion of courts, the promotion of social justice, and the provision of platforms for the amicable settlement of disputes that often produce win–win outcomes and reconciliation. Despite these benefits, its development is constrained by factors such as the absence of binding precedent, difficulties in balancing power relations between disputing parties, limited public sanction, and a shortage of skilled practitioners compounded by inadequate training. The study concludes that ADR is closely linked to reconciliation and peace, both of which are essential for nation-building. It therefore recommends sustained public enlightenment, improved planning and information management, the engagement of qualified personnel with adequate training, and increased funding for both public and private ADR centres. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Conflict, Conflict Resolution, Court System, Litigation, Nation-Building, Reconciliation, Peace

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Ilorin (NG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.