GPVI: An Internal Index Based on Grouping Partition for Clustering Validity Validation

In supervised learning, algorithm evaluation is guided by those performance measures relying on known class labels, such as accuracy. Instead, in unsupervised learning, one can use internal indices that only rely on properties intrinsic to datasets as labels are usually not available. As an important research branch in unsupervised learning, significant effort has been made to solve clustering validation issues, especially the internal indices. Most of the existing internal indices either cannot handle arbitrarily shaped clusters or have complex hyperparameters to set up. In this paper, we focus on internal clustering validity index and propose the Grouping Partition Validity Index (GPVI), a new validity index using the Three-Sigma rule and the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST). Furthermore, a mixing-level variant, denoted as GPVI-M (M for “mixing-level”), is derived from GPVI to increase sensitivity to local overlap. The advantage of GPVI and GPVI-M is that they are parameter free and are designed to be robust across diverse cluster geometries and challenging conditions such as nonconvexity, overlap, imbalance, and moderate noise. The key technology of GPVI and GPVI-M is to divide a cluster into multiple smaller clusters for analysis. Experiments on fifteen datasets show the effectiveness of our indices for clustering validity evaluation. Especially, our indices demonstrate the ability to cope with those datasets with special properties, such as non-convex shape, mixed shape, imbalance, outliers and noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-026-01295-y
Primary Topic
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GPVI: An Internal Index Based on Grouping Partition for Clustering Validity Validation

Jinzhe Li, Xin Pan
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
article

GPVI: An Internal Index Based on Grouping Partition for Clustering Validity Validation

Jinzhe Li, Xin Pan
article en

Abstract

In supervised learning, algorithm evaluation is guided by those performance measures relying on known class labels, such as accuracy. Instead, in unsupervised learning, one can use internal indices that only rely on properties intrinsic to datasets as labels are usually not available. As an important research branch in unsupervised learning, significant effort has been made to solve clustering validation issues, especially the internal indices. Most of the existing internal indices either cannot handle arbitrarily shaped clusters or have complex hyperparameters to set up. In this paper, we focus on internal clustering validity index and propose the Grouping Partition Validity Index (GPVI), a new validity index using the Three-Sigma rule and the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST). Furthermore, a mixing-level variant, denoted as GPVI-M (M for “mixing-level”), is derived from GPVI to increase sensitivity to local overlap. The advantage of GPVI and GPVI-M is that they are parameter free and are designed to be robust across diverse cluster geometries and challenging conditions such as nonconvexity, overlap, imbalance, and moderate noise. The key technology of GPVI and GPVI-M is to divide a cluster into multiple smaller clusters for analysis. Experiments on fifteen datasets show the effectiveness of our indices for clustering validity evaluation. Especially, our indices demonstrate the ability to cope with those datasets with special properties, such as non-convex shape, mixed shape, imbalance, outliers and noise.

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Aviation General Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.