Comparação entre Anestesia Sem Opioides e Anestesia com Opioides na Analgesia Pós-Operatória em Cirurgia Urológica Laparoscópica: Ensaio Clínico Randomizado

Introduction: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) aims to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. This study compared opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in elective laparoscopic urological surgery.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 70 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic urological procedures were assigned to either an opioid-free (OF) or an opioid-based (OB) anesthesia group. The OF group received dexmedetomidine (loading dose 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, maintenance 0.5 μg/kg/h), while the OB group received fentanyl at equivalent dosing. The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Scale at Rest (VAS-R) 1 hour after surgery. Secondary outcomes included VAS-R and VAS during coughing (VAS-C) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 h; rescue analgesia; total 24-h tramadol use; and adverse events.Results: VAS-R at 1 hour was significantly lower in the OF group (mean difference −0.94 (1.21)], p<0.005). Fewer OFA patients required rescue tramadol (28.6% vs 77.1%, p<0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred less frequently in the OF group (0% vs 14.3%, p<0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine-based OFA improved early postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, and lowered PONV rates compared with fentanyl anesthesia. OFA appears to be safe and consistent with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparação entre Anestesia Sem Opioides e Anestesia com Opioides na Analgesia Pós-Operatória em Cirurgia Urológica Laparoscópica: Ensaio Clínico Randomizado

Shradha Prasad, Shipra Aggarwal, Tanmay Yadav
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparação entre Anestesia Sem Opioides e Anestesia com Opioides na Analgesia Pós-Operatória em Cirurgia Urológica Laparoscópica: Ensaio Clínico Randomizado

Shradha Prasad, Shipra Aggarwal, Tanmay Yadav
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) aims to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. This study compared opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in elective laparoscopic urological surgery.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 70 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic urological procedures were assigned to either an opioid-free (OF) or an opioid-based (OB) anesthesia group. The OF group received dexmedetomidine (loading dose 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, maintenance 0.5 μg/kg/h), while the OB group received fentanyl at equivalent dosing. The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Scale at Rest (VAS-R) 1 hour after surgery. Secondary outcomes included VAS-R and VAS during coughing (VAS-C) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 h; rescue analgesia; total 24-h tramadol use; and adverse events.Results: VAS-R at 1 hour was significantly lower in the OF group (mean difference −0.94 (1.21)], p<0.005). Fewer OFA patients required rescue tramadol (28.6% vs 77.1%, p<0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred less frequently in the OF group (0% vs 14.3%, p<0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine-based OFA improved early postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, and lowered PONV rates compared with fentanyl anesthesia. OFA appears to be safe and consistent with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations.

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.