The Third Culture and the Fourth Estate: Investigating Journalistic Perspectives on Institutional and Epistemological Conditions for Social Science Media Representation

This article investigates reasons for the elusive news media representation of social science and embeds its results in broader institutional and epistemic contexts. Methodically, it combines expert interviews with senior journalists covering social science topics for German leading media outlets and case studies of the media coverage of selected sociological publications. The findings show that there does not seem to be a shared understanding of social science even among journalists covering disciplines from the social science spectrum. Moreover, the journalistic interview experts perceive traditional media department structures as limiting and as an obstacle to covering social science adequately. The case studies additionally illustrate parallels between the inner-academic diversity of social science and the dispersion of its findings across media departments. It is argued that these insights can be related to longstanding institutional boundaries and epistemic conflicts systemically shaping academia and journalism alike – making social science communication a particular challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerva
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-026-09638-x
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Third Culture and the Fourth Estate: Investigating Journalistic Perspectives on Institutional and Epistemological Conditions for Social Science Media Representation

Tobias Kreutzer
Minerva
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

The Third Culture and the Fourth Estate: Investigating Journalistic Perspectives on Institutional and Epistemological Conditions for Social Science Media Representation

Tobias Kreutzer
article en

Abstract

This article investigates reasons for the elusive news media representation of social science and embeds its results in broader institutional and epistemic contexts. Methodically, it combines expert interviews with senior journalists covering social science topics for German leading media outlets and case studies of the media coverage of selected sociological publications. The findings show that there does not seem to be a shared understanding of social science even among journalists covering disciplines from the social science spectrum. Moreover, the journalistic interview experts perceive traditional media department structures as limiting and as an obstacle to covering social science adequately. The case studies additionally illustrate parallels between the inner-academic diversity of social science and the dispersion of its findings across media departments. It is argued that these insights can be related to longstanding institutional boundaries and epistemic conflicts systemically shaping academia and journalism alike – making social science communication a particular challenge.

Minerva
TU Dortmund University (DE)
Technische Universität Dortmund
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.