Meeting Students Where They Are: A Field Experiment of Classroom Interventions for Voter Turnout Among College Students

ABSTRACT Objective The goal of this project is to test the effectiveness of various get‐out‐the‐vote (GOTV) strategies on college students’ propensity to vote in state and local elections. Methods We conduct a field experiment testing different types of GOTV activities at a large public university during a low salience local election. Undergraduate classes were randomly assigned to receive a short peer‐led voting presentation, emails with voting information, or no contact. Results We verified voting using the state voter file and found that students who received an in‐person presentation were 11 percentage points more likely to vote than those who received no voting encouragement from the study. We did not observe a statistically significant effect from email encouragement. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with prior literature on voter mobilization and suggest that low cost GOTV efforts, such as email campaigns, are not likely to be effective at driving student turnout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70149
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meeting Students Where They Are: A Field Experiment of Classroom Interventions for Voter Turnout Among College Students

Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Timothy Bynion
Social Science Quarterly
Social Media and Politics
article

Meeting Students Where They Are: A Field Experiment of Classroom Interventions for Voter Turnout Among College Students

Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Timothy Bynion
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The goal of this project is to test the effectiveness of various get‐out‐the‐vote (GOTV) strategies on college students’ propensity to vote in state and local elections. Methods We conduct a field experiment testing different types of GOTV activities at a large public university during a low salience local election. Undergraduate classes were randomly assigned to receive a short peer‐led voting presentation, emails with voting information, or no contact. Results We verified voting using the state voter file and found that students who received an in‐person presentation were 11 percentage points more likely to vote than those who received no voting encouragement from the study. We did not observe a statistically significant effect from email encouragement. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with prior literature on voter mobilization and suggest that low cost GOTV efforts, such as email campaigns, are not likely to be effective at driving student turnout.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 107(3)
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.