When Does a System Remain the Same System? - The Complete Structure of Persistence and Identity under Transformation

Every system undergoes change. Yet some systems remain the same. This paper addresses the fundamental question: under what conditions does identity persist under real transformation? We show that this question admits a single structural answer. From three minimal assumptions — distinguishability, real transformation, and decidability — a unique structure follows: identity-bearing structure, transformation-processing capacity, and their coupling. These roles combine into a single capacity measure, yielding a necessary and sufficient condition for persistence. This condition is not a modeling choice. It is the only admissible form consistent with the persistence problem itself. This paper derives LP from minimal axioms and establishes the dynamic persistence equation. Parts I–XIII constitute the formally closed core (Level A): derived from M1–M3 alone. Parts XIV–XXIII constitute formally derived extensions (Level B), applying M1–M3 to multi-system environments and higher-order structures. All structural hypotheses are formally closed. LP is precisely falsifiable. Physical stability results in thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and quantum mechanics are special cases of IR ≤ 1.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19506070
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Does a System Remain the Same System? - The Complete Structure of Persistence and Identity under Transformation

Marc Maibom
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
article

When Does a System Remain the Same System? - The Complete Structure of Persistence and Identity under Transformation

Marc Maibom
article en

Abstract

Every system undergoes change. Yet some systems remain the same. This paper addresses the fundamental question: under what conditions does identity persist under real transformation? We show that this question admits a single structural answer. From three minimal assumptions — distinguishability, real transformation, and decidability — a unique structure follows: identity-bearing structure, transformation-processing capacity, and their coupling. These roles combine into a single capacity measure, yielding a necessary and sufficient condition for persistence. This condition is not a modeling choice. It is the only admissible form consistent with the persistence problem itself. This paper derives LP from minimal axioms and establishes the dynamic persistence equation. Parts I–XIII constitute the formally closed core (Level A): derived from M1–M3 alone. Parts XIV–XXIII constitute formally derived extensions (Level B), applying M1–M3 to multi-system environments and higher-order structures. All structural hypotheses are formally closed. LP is precisely falsifiable. Physical stability results in thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and quantum mechanics are special cases of IR ≤ 1.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Complex Systems and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Does a System Remain the Same System? - The Complete Structure of Persistence and Identity under Transformation — Marc Maibom · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS