Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering

This letter examines the role of letters to the editor (LTEs) as a forum for public and professional engagement with geoengineering. Based on a bibliometric analysis of 66 LTEs indexed in the Web of Science, the authors identify dominant thematic focuses, authorship patterns, and geographical representation. The findings show that LTEs are primarily oriented toward practical issues such as governance and priority setting, while contributions from low- and middle-income countries remain limited. The letter argues that LTEs can serve as an accessible and dialogical format for inclusive engagement in controversial scientific domains and recommends expanding free-to-publish and open-access correspondence formats to enhance global participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews on Environmental Health
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0161
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering

Сергій Андрійович Назаровець, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Timothy Daly
Reviews on Environmental Health
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering

Сергій Андрійович Назаровець, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Timothy Daly
article en

Abstract

This letter examines the role of letters to the editor (LTEs) as a forum for public and professional engagement with geoengineering. Based on a bibliometric analysis of 66 LTEs indexed in the Web of Science, the authors identify dominant thematic focuses, authorship patterns, and geographical representation. The findings show that LTEs are primarily oriented toward practical issues such as governance and priority setting, while contributions from low- and middle-income countries remain limited. The letter argues that LTEs can serve as an accessible and dialogical format for inclusive engagement in controversial scientific domains and recommends expanding free-to-publish and open-access correspondence formats to enhance global participation.

Reviews on Environmental Health
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Kagawa University (JP), Sorbonne Université (FR), Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede Argentina (AR), Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University (UA), Sciences, Normes, Démocratie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering — Сергій Андрійович Назаровець, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, et al. · Reviews on Environmental Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS