Effect of Seedlings Conservation Methods on Physiological Recovery and Tuber Yield of Solenostemon rotundifolius [(Poir.) J.K. Morton]

Despite its many advantages, Solenostemon rotundifolius remains underutilized. Inadequate seedling conservation impairs their quality and reduces germination and yield. This study evaluates the effect of conservation methods on physiological recovery and tuber yield. A trial was conducted during the 2023/2024 rainy season using a split-plot design with three replicates. The main factor was the seedling conservation method, with nine treatments: in canaries, “bitatoré” (without additives or combined with millet husks, sand, or wood chips as additives), and the Triple S system. The secondary factor was genotype (E120, E165, E186, ‘white’, and UW086 M). The parameters studied included the germination rate, growth rate, number of tillers, and tuber yield parameters. The results showed that conservation methods significantly influence the number of tubers, their diameter (P < 0.0001), and their weight (P = 0.001). In contrast, germination and growth remain similar. Seedling conservation methods in the “bitatoré” with or without an additive promote an increase in the number of shoots (from 8.00 ± 0.83 to 8.18 ± 0.83 shoots) and tuber weight (153.86 ± 23.95 g to 186.72 ± 28.78 g). Overall, the use of appropriate methods for seedlings conservation, particularly the “bitatoré” method, appears to promote better plant establishment and improved tuber yield in S. rotundifolius, although genotype also plays a decisive role in performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i44183
Primary Topic
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Seedlings Conservation Methods on Physiological Recovery and Tuber Yield of Solenostemon rotundifolius [(Poir.) J.K. Morton]

Aboubacar Sory, Rasmata Nana, Rodrigue Arnaud ZONGO
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
article

Effect of Seedlings Conservation Methods on Physiological Recovery and Tuber Yield of Solenostemon rotundifolius [(Poir.) J.K. Morton]

Aboubacar Sory, Rasmata Nana, Rodrigue Arnaud ZONGO
article en

Abstract

Despite its many advantages, Solenostemon rotundifolius remains underutilized. Inadequate seedling conservation impairs their quality and reduces germination and yield. This study evaluates the effect of conservation methods on physiological recovery and tuber yield. A trial was conducted during the 2023/2024 rainy season using a split-plot design with three replicates. The main factor was the seedling conservation method, with nine treatments: in canaries, “bitatoré” (without additives or combined with millet husks, sand, or wood chips as additives), and the Triple S system. The secondary factor was genotype (E120, E165, E186, ‘white’, and UW086 M). The parameters studied included the germination rate, growth rate, number of tillers, and tuber yield parameters. The results showed that conservation methods significantly influence the number of tubers, their diameter (P < 0.0001), and their weight (P = 0.001). In contrast, germination and growth remain similar. Seedling conservation methods in the “bitatoré” with or without an additive promote an increase in the number of shoots (from 8.00 ± 0.83 to 8.18 ± 0.83 shoots) and tuber weight (153.86 ± 23.95 g to 186.72 ± 28.78 g). Overall, the use of appropriate methods for seedlings conservation, particularly the “bitatoré” method, appears to promote better plant establishment and improved tuber yield in S. rotundifolius, although genotype also plays a decisive role in performance.

Journal of Experimental Agriculture InternationalVol. 48(4)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.