Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety

Background/Aim: Sintilimab combined with bevacizumab (Sinti-Bev) is recommended as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in China. However, the IMbrave150 and ORIENT-32 trials reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) leading to bevacizumab interruption or discontinuation. Therefore, we aimed to explore the clinical impact of low-dose bevacizumab combined with sintilimab as a first-line therapy in patients with uHCC. Patients and Methods: A total of 85 patients who received Sinti-Bev as first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into low-dose (7.5 mg/kg, n=47) and high-dose (15 mg/kg, n=38) groups according to bevacizumab dosage. Antitumor efficacy, TRAEs incidence, and treatment duration were compared between groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline covariates. Results: In our study, although 91.8% of patients received Sinti-Bev combined with transarterial therapy (TAT), there was no significant difference in the number of TAT between groups. The low-dose group did not show significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: 9.4 vs.10.5 months, P = 0.837) and objective response rate (ORR: 61.70% vs. 63.16%, P = 0.890) compared with the high-dose group. Nevertheless, the overall survival (OS) rates in the low-dose group were numerically higher than those in the high-dose group (6/12/18 months: 94%/77%/55% vs. 91%/71%/48%). Post-IPTW analyses yielded consistent findings. Importantly, the incidence of esophagogastric variceal (EGV) bleeding was numerically lower in the low-dose group (10.6% vs. 21.1%), with fewer grade ≥3 bleeding events (6.38% vs. 18.42%). After IPTW adjustment, the median treatment duration was approximately 2.5 months longer in the low-dose group (12.0 vs. 9.5 months). Conclusion: Compared to high-dose bevacizumab combined with sintilimab, the low-dose regimen showed no significant differences in PFS, OS, or ORR, while improving safety and treatment continuity. Low-dose bevacizumab may serve as a safer alternative dose for uHCC patients with increased bleeding risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/jhc.s582999
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety

Xiao Wang, Xu Wang, Ye Mao, Jianbing Wu et al.
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety

Xiao Wang, Xu Wang, Ye Mao, Jianbing Wu, An Li, Xiaohuan Lai, Lin Xu
article en

Abstract

Background/Aim: Sintilimab combined with bevacizumab (Sinti-Bev) is recommended as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in China. However, the IMbrave150 and ORIENT-32 trials reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) leading to bevacizumab interruption or discontinuation. Therefore, we aimed to explore the clinical impact of low-dose bevacizumab combined with sintilimab as a first-line therapy in patients with uHCC. Patients and Methods: A total of 85 patients who received Sinti-Bev as first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into low-dose (7.5 mg/kg, n=47) and high-dose (15 mg/kg, n=38) groups according to bevacizumab dosage. Antitumor efficacy, TRAEs incidence, and treatment duration were compared between groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline covariates. Results: In our study, although 91.8% of patients received Sinti-Bev combined with transarterial therapy (TAT), there was no significant difference in the number of TAT between groups. The low-dose group did not show significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: 9.4 vs.10.5 months, P = 0.837) and objective response rate (ORR: 61.70% vs. 63.16%, P = 0.890) compared with the high-dose group. Nevertheless, the overall survival (OS) rates in the low-dose group were numerically higher than those in the high-dose group (6/12/18 months: 94%/77%/55% vs. 91%/71%/48%). Post-IPTW analyses yielded consistent findings. Importantly, the incidence of esophagogastric variceal (EGV) bleeding was numerically lower in the low-dose group (10.6% vs. 21.1%), with fewer grade ≥3 bleeding events (6.38% vs. 18.42%). After IPTW adjustment, the median treatment duration was approximately 2.5 months longer in the low-dose group (12.0 vs. 9.5 months). Conclusion: Compared to high-dose bevacizumab combined with sintilimab, the low-dose regimen showed no significant differences in PFS, OS, or ORR, while improving safety and treatment continuity. Low-dose bevacizumab may serve as a safer alternative dose for uHCC patients with increased bleeding risk.

Journal of Hepatocellular CarcinomaVol. Volume 13
Nanchang University (CN), Guilin Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College (CN), Ganzhou People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.