Forest change across the European Union: spatial patterns, drivers, and governance insights from a pan-European expert survey

Abstract Key message Forests in Europe are changing unevenly. Recovery dominates parts of Northern and Central Europe, while disturbance, degradation, and loss intensify in Southern and Eastern regions, and urbanization-driven fragmentation is spreading widely. A pan-European expert survey shows that climate and market pressures matter everywhere, but forest change outcomes depend most on governance capacity—enforcement, coordination, and regionally adapted incentives. Context European forests are central to climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem service provision, yet they are undergoing rapid and uneven change under climatic, economic, and land-use pressures. While inventories and remote sensing document large-scale trends, they provide limited understanding into governance changes and context-specific drivers affecting forest change across regions. Aims This study examines expert opinions on what forest changes are occurring across the EU, where they are concentrated, why they are taking place, and who the key actors moving these changes forward are. Methods A structured expert survey was conducted across all 27 EU Member States, collecting assessments on forest change types, spatial patterns, drivers, and governance arrangements. Responses were aggregated at the country level and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic coding within a PESTEL framework. Results Afforestation and reforestation dominate in Northern Europe and parts of Central Europe, while degradation, disturbance-driven losses, and deforestation pressures intensify in Southern and Eastern regions. Forest fragmentation linked to urbanization is increasingly pan-European. Climate change and market pressures were universally recognized, but forest change outcomes consistently depended on governance capacity, enforcement, and institutional coherence. National policymakers and the agricultural sector were identified as the most influential actors, with conflicts reported across all regions. Conclusion The findings indicate that European forest change trajectories are determined not only by changes in forest area but also by differences in governance capacity and institutional coherence. These results emphasize the importance of considering governance context when interpreting forest change patterns and designing regionally adapted policy responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Forest Science
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-026-01335-9
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest change across the European Union: spatial patterns, drivers, and governance insights from a pan-European expert survey

Nicolaos P. Theodossiou, Mihaela Sima, Karina Stankeviča, Māris Kļaviņš et al.
Annals of Forest Science
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Forest change across the European Union: spatial patterns, drivers, and governance insights from a pan-European expert survey

Nicolaos P. Theodossiou, Mihaela Sima, Karina Stankeviča, Māris Kļaviņš, Zane Vincēviča-Gaile, Janis Krumins
article en

Abstract

Abstract Key message Forests in Europe are changing unevenly. Recovery dominates parts of Northern and Central Europe, while disturbance, degradation, and loss intensify in Southern and Eastern regions, and urbanization-driven fragmentation is spreading widely. A pan-European expert survey shows that climate and market pressures matter everywhere, but forest change outcomes depend most on governance capacity—enforcement, coordination, and regionally adapted incentives. Context European forests are central to climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem service provision, yet they are undergoing rapid and uneven change under climatic, economic, and land-use pressures. While inventories and remote sensing document large-scale trends, they provide limited understanding into governance changes and context-specific drivers affecting forest change across regions. Aims This study examines expert opinions on what forest changes are occurring across the EU, where they are concentrated, why they are taking place, and who the key actors moving these changes forward are. Methods A structured expert survey was conducted across all 27 EU Member States, collecting assessments on forest change types, spatial patterns, drivers, and governance arrangements. Responses were aggregated at the country level and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic coding within a PESTEL framework. Results Afforestation and reforestation dominate in Northern Europe and parts of Central Europe, while degradation, disturbance-driven losses, and deforestation pressures intensify in Southern and Eastern regions. Forest fragmentation linked to urbanization is increasingly pan-European. Climate change and market pressures were universally recognized, but forest change outcomes consistently depended on governance capacity, enforcement, and institutional coherence. National policymakers and the agricultural sector were identified as the most influential actors, with conflicts reported across all regions. Conclusion The findings indicate that European forest change trajectories are determined not only by changes in forest area but also by differences in governance capacity and institutional coherence. These results emphasize the importance of considering governance context when interpreting forest change patterns and designing regionally adapted policy responses.

Annals of Forest Science
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Romanian Academy (RO), University of Latvia (LV)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.