Aesthetic Innovation in the Nation-Making of Japan and the Ottoman Empire: A Comparative Study

This article examines the prevalence of aesthetics within the political and social reorganization of the late nineteenth century and its central role in shaping the concept of national literature in the Ottoman Empire and Japan. It contextualizes the emergence of literary modernity within the simultaneous rise of nationalism and radical modernization in two cultures that did not experience direct colonial rule—one in the West and the other in East Asia. Drawing primarily on existing research, it compares how intellectuals in these two contexts understood the relationship between aesthetics and cultural transformation. The article argues that literary aesthetics is not a dependent variable of political and economic processes, but possesses an autonomy that allowed writers of the reorganization period to explore and negotiate new possibilities within a not-yet-solidified national consciousness. It pays particular attention to the complexities surrounding the transition to nation- states in Japan and the Ottoman Empire and traces this process across three domains: the use of literature to articulate civic ideals under censorship; the contested institutionalization of literature as a national and disciplinary category grounded in classical traditions; and the rise of print culture and criticism, which enabled new forms of public engagement. The article thus offers a comparative overview of the aesthetic and literary scene, opening further avenues for comparison across other non-Western contexts not shaped by direct colonial intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Humanities at Kyushu University
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5109/7419032
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aesthetic Innovation in the Nation-Making of Japan and the Ottoman Empire: A Comparative Study

Özen Nergis Dolcerocca
Journal of Asian Humanities at Kyushu University
Japanese History and Culture
article

Aesthetic Innovation in the Nation-Making of Japan and the Ottoman Empire: A Comparative Study

Özen Nergis Dolcerocca
article en

Abstract

This article examines the prevalence of aesthetics within the political and social reorganization of the late nineteenth century and its central role in shaping the concept of national literature in the Ottoman Empire and Japan. It contextualizes the emergence of literary modernity within the simultaneous rise of nationalism and radical modernization in two cultures that did not experience direct colonial rule—one in the West and the other in East Asia. Drawing primarily on existing research, it compares how intellectuals in these two contexts understood the relationship between aesthetics and cultural transformation. The article argues that literary aesthetics is not a dependent variable of political and economic processes, but possesses an autonomy that allowed writers of the reorganization period to explore and negotiate new possibilities within a not-yet-solidified national consciousness. It pays particular attention to the complexities surrounding the transition to nation- states in Japan and the Ottoman Empire and traces this process across three domains: the use of literature to articulate civic ideals under censorship; the contested institutionalization of literature as a national and disciplinary category grounded in classical traditions; and the rise of print culture and criticism, which enabled new forms of public engagement. The article thus offers a comparative overview of the aesthetic and literary scene, opening further avenues for comparison across other non-Western contexts not shaped by direct colonial intervention.

Journal of Asian Humanities at Kyushu UniversityVol. 11
University of Modern Sciences (AE)
European Commission, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.