Comparative Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy and cryotherapy are treatment options for actinic keratosis; however, their efficacy and safety remain debated. AIMS: To perform a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy and cryotherapy in actinic keratosis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Science Direct, Ovid, EBSCO, Wiley, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 1233 patients were identified. PDT and cryotherapy showed similar success in clearing lesions (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13; p = 0.74). While both treatments performed comparably on the head and face (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28; p = 0.24), data from one trial suggested cryotherapy might be more effective for lesions on the arms and legs (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; p < 0.05). However, more research is needed to confirm this finding. Cosmetic outcomes were significantly better for PDT (74.62% vs. 49.11%: RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.4-1.65; p < 0.00001) than cryotherapy. Similarly, PDT was superior to cryotherapy in patient satisfaction though the overall difference was not statistically significant (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.91-2.25; p = 0.12). PDT was associated with a significantly higher risk of burning sensations and pain (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.27-3.02; p = 0.002), whereas cryotherapy more frequently led to vesicles and blisters. CONCLUSION: Lesion clearance may depend on location. It is comparable for head and face lesions, while data from one trial suggests cryotherapy may be better for extremity lesions. PDT is associated with a higher occurrence of pain/burning, while cryotherapy leads to more vesicles/blisters. Future research should focus on standardized protocols, including blinded post-treatment assessments to improve reliability and minimize bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70749
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Dhai Nasser Almutairi, Fadi Alghamdi, Majid Hassan Saleh Alhammadi, Saleh M. Aldraibi et al.
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Comparative Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Dhai Nasser Almutairi, Fadi Alghamdi, Majid Hassan Saleh Alhammadi, Saleh M. Aldraibi, Maya Alharbi, Kholoud Alzubaidi, Jumanah Makhtoum, Omar Turkistani, Abdulmalik Bin Kassim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy and cryotherapy are treatment options for actinic keratosis; however, their efficacy and safety remain debated. AIMS: To perform a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy and cryotherapy in actinic keratosis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Science Direct, Ovid, EBSCO, Wiley, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 1233 patients were identified. PDT and cryotherapy showed similar success in clearing lesions (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13; p = 0.74). While both treatments performed comparably on the head and face (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28; p = 0.24), data from one trial suggested cryotherapy might be more effective for lesions on the arms and legs (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; p < 0.05). However, more research is needed to confirm this finding. Cosmetic outcomes were significantly better for PDT (74.62% vs. 49.11%: RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.4-1.65; p < 0.00001) than cryotherapy. Similarly, PDT was superior to cryotherapy in patient satisfaction though the overall difference was not statistically significant (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.91-2.25; p = 0.12). PDT was associated with a significantly higher risk of burning sensations and pain (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.27-3.02; p = 0.002), whereas cryotherapy more frequently led to vesicles and blisters. CONCLUSION: Lesion clearance may depend on location. It is comparable for head and face lesions, while data from one trial suggests cryotherapy may be better for extremity lesions. PDT is associated with a higher occurrence of pain/burning, while cryotherapy leads to more vesicles/blisters. Future research should focus on standardized protocols, including blinded post-treatment assessments to improve reliability and minimize bias.

Journal of Cosmetic DermatologyVol. 25(4)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Shaikh Khalifa Medical City (AE), King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Northern Area Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Khaled Hospital (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.