Financing energy communities: Actors, instruments, builders, and ESG ecosystem expectations in Italy

This paper examines the financing of energy communities in Italy, focusing on the roles of key actors, financial instruments, and project builders. It also analyses the economic and ESG impacts that financing actors expect from energy communities. These expectations are shaped by Italy's progressive regulatory framework, which has already supported more than 422 energy communities. We conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in financing and building energy communities, supplemented by extensive desk research. Our descriptive analysis identified the financing instruments used by different actors and their recipients both within and beyond the ECs. Thematic analysis highlights the crucial role of municipalities and technical partners in successful project implementation, though municipalities often face significant challenges. Mixed funding, a balanced energy production-consumption ratio, and scalable installations are essential to attract private investment; however, social fund regulations substantially prolong payback periods. Therefore, private actors are primarily driven by indirect economic (e.g., cross-selling, territorial presence) and strategic benefits, while public stakeholders focus on social outcomes. Nonetheless, ECs' potential to address energy poverty is limited by incentive tariff design and modest private-sector engagement. These factors, along with low economic returns, risk undermining ECs viability once subsidies end. The article concludes with stakeholder and policy recommendations aimed at enhancing private investment while advancing the social objectives of energy communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115246
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financing energy communities: Actors, instruments, builders, and ESG ecosystem expectations in Italy

Maksym Koltunov, Luca Tricarico, Adriano Bisello
Energy Policy
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Financing energy communities: Actors, instruments, builders, and ESG ecosystem expectations in Italy

Maksym Koltunov, Luca Tricarico, Adriano Bisello
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the financing of energy communities in Italy, focusing on the roles of key actors, financial instruments, and project builders. It also analyses the economic and ESG impacts that financing actors expect from energy communities. These expectations are shaped by Italy's progressive regulatory framework, which has already supported more than 422 energy communities. We conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in financing and building energy communities, supplemented by extensive desk research. Our descriptive analysis identified the financing instruments used by different actors and their recipients both within and beyond the ECs. Thematic analysis highlights the crucial role of municipalities and technical partners in successful project implementation, though municipalities often face significant challenges. Mixed funding, a balanced energy production-consumption ratio, and scalable installations are essential to attract private investment; however, social fund regulations substantially prolong payback periods. Therefore, private actors are primarily driven by indirect economic (e.g., cross-selling, territorial presence) and strategic benefits, while public stakeholders focus on social outcomes. Nonetheless, ECs' potential to address energy poverty is limited by incentive tariff design and modest private-sector engagement. These factors, along with low economic returns, risk undermining ECs viability once subsidies end. The article concludes with stakeholder and policy recommendations aimed at enhancing private investment while advancing the social objectives of energy communities.

Energy PolicyVol. 215
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.