Cost of Living in Leopard Habitat: Pattern, Drivers, and Perceptions of Human‐Leopard Conflict in the Aravalli Hilly Landscape, Rajasthan, India

ABSTRACT Large carnivores face increasing challenges in human‐dominated landscapes, where conflict undermines both livelihoods and conservation goals. We investigated the patterns, drivers, and community perceptions of human–leopard conflict in and around Jaisamand Wildlife Sanctuary, southern Aravalli Hills, Rajasthan, India, between 2011 and 2024. We documented a total of 572 conflict incidents, largely livestock depredation (98.08%), with goats, cows and calves being most frequently targeted. Conflict occurred year‐round, peaking at night in cattle sheds and households. Modeling identified elevation, land‐use/land‐cover, distance to sanctuary, and distance to human habitation (DTHH) as strong predictors of conflict probability, with highest risk in built‐up and scrubland areas near village peripheries. Husbandry practices, including poorly constructed cattle sheds seem to be associated with increased livestock vulnerability, while coping strategies (e.g., night guarding) were largely ineffective. Only 31% of depredation cases were claimed for compensation, and approved payouts were significantly lower than actual losses, reinforcing economic grievances. Encouragingly, no retaliatory killings were reported, reflecting cultural coexistence toward wildlife. Surveys ( n = 201) revealed that local attitude were close to neutral, with only a slight negative tendency (mean attitude score = −0.2). Education level emerged as the strongest determinant of coexistence, with more educated respondents expressing greater positive orientation toward leopards. Our findings demonstrate that conflict in semi‐arid landscapes arises from the intersection of ecological, socio‐economic, and institutional factors. Effective coexistence strategies should prioritize leopard‐proof livestock enclosures, equitable and timely compensation, education‐based awareness programs, and landscape‐level planning beyond protected areas to foster long‐term human–leopard coexistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Research
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.70069
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost of Living in Leopard Habitat: Pattern, Drivers, and Perceptions of Human‐Leopard Conflict in the Aravalli Hilly Landscape, Rajasthan, India

Vijay Kumar Koli, Utkarsh Prajapati, Nirbhay Singh Chouhan, Kamal Vaishnav
Ecological Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Cost of Living in Leopard Habitat: Pattern, Drivers, and Perceptions of Human‐Leopard Conflict in the Aravalli Hilly Landscape, Rajasthan, India

Vijay Kumar Koli, Utkarsh Prajapati, Nirbhay Singh Chouhan, Kamal Vaishnav
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Large carnivores face increasing challenges in human‐dominated landscapes, where conflict undermines both livelihoods and conservation goals. We investigated the patterns, drivers, and community perceptions of human–leopard conflict in and around Jaisamand Wildlife Sanctuary, southern Aravalli Hills, Rajasthan, India, between 2011 and 2024. We documented a total of 572 conflict incidents, largely livestock depredation (98.08%), with goats, cows and calves being most frequently targeted. Conflict occurred year‐round, peaking at night in cattle sheds and households. Modeling identified elevation, land‐use/land‐cover, distance to sanctuary, and distance to human habitation (DTHH) as strong predictors of conflict probability, with highest risk in built‐up and scrubland areas near village peripheries. Husbandry practices, including poorly constructed cattle sheds seem to be associated with increased livestock vulnerability, while coping strategies (e.g., night guarding) were largely ineffective. Only 31% of depredation cases were claimed for compensation, and approved payouts were significantly lower than actual losses, reinforcing economic grievances. Encouragingly, no retaliatory killings were reported, reflecting cultural coexistence toward wildlife. Surveys ( n = 201) revealed that local attitude were close to neutral, with only a slight negative tendency (mean attitude score = −0.2). Education level emerged as the strongest determinant of coexistence, with more educated respondents expressing greater positive orientation toward leopards. Our findings demonstrate that conflict in semi‐arid landscapes arises from the intersection of ecological, socio‐economic, and institutional factors. Effective coexistence strategies should prioritize leopard‐proof livestock enclosures, equitable and timely compensation, education‐based awareness programs, and landscape‐level planning beyond protected areas to foster long‐term human–leopard coexistence.

Ecological ResearchVol. 41(3)
Centre For Wildlife Studies (IN), Mohanlal Sukhadia University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.