Conceptualising pedagogical content knowledge for writing through the lens of curriculum statements: A comparative case study

Abstract This study explores the knowledge required for teaching writing by considering how writing and learning to write are conceptualised in Norway's and Aotearoa New Zealand's curricula. Using Shulman's concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a lens, it examines the explicit and implicit knowledge requirements of the curricula that have implications for teachers' interpretation and implementation work. While previous research focused on the craft of writing, this study adopts a broader perspective, encompassing competencies, context and society. The findings reveal three main categories of knowledge—about (1) language and texts as objects or resources for meaning making, (2) how to act and interact with these resources and (3) purposes of writing at individual and societal levels. The study uses the metaphor of ‘multifocal lenses’ to illustrate teachers' need to operate across multiple planes of focus, from linguistic resources and various subject matters to the roles of writing within the societies' collective cultures and histories. Additionally, despite shifting emphases in curriculum statements, the study highlights the potential of curriculum analysis to be a methodological window into a more general phenomenon, in this case the pedagogical content knowledge for writing .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Curriculum Journal
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.70052
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualising pedagogical content knowledge for writing through the lens of curriculum statements: A comparative case study

Judy M. Parr, Randi Solheim, Rebecca Jesson
The Curriculum Journal
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Conceptualising pedagogical content knowledge for writing through the lens of curriculum statements: A comparative case study

Judy M. Parr, Randi Solheim, Rebecca Jesson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the knowledge required for teaching writing by considering how writing and learning to write are conceptualised in Norway's and Aotearoa New Zealand's curricula. Using Shulman's concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a lens, it examines the explicit and implicit knowledge requirements of the curricula that have implications for teachers' interpretation and implementation work. While previous research focused on the craft of writing, this study adopts a broader perspective, encompassing competencies, context and society. The findings reveal three main categories of knowledge—about (1) language and texts as objects or resources for meaning making, (2) how to act and interact with these resources and (3) purposes of writing at individual and societal levels. The study uses the metaphor of ‘multifocal lenses’ to illustrate teachers' need to operate across multiple planes of focus, from linguistic resources and various subject matters to the roles of writing within the societies' collective cultures and histories. Additionally, despite shifting emphases in curriculum statements, the study highlights the potential of curriculum analysis to be a methodological window into a more general phenomenon, in this case the pedagogical content knowledge for writing .

The Curriculum Journal
University of Auckland (NZ), NTNU Samfunnsforskning (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.