Can You Feel My Pain Tonight? – Automated Pain Assessment and Epistemic Injustice

Automated pain assessment systems (APAS) are currently being developed to facilitate third-party pain assessments in patients with limited verbal communication abilities. They come with the danger, however, of disregarding patients in their capacity as competent knowers of their own pain experiences. Favoring the predictions of APAS over the self-reports of pain experiences may constitute a particular severe form of testimonial injustice, as we seem to have a special epistemic authority with regard to them. By investigating these potential dangers, the paper a) points to implications for pain management in the face of an emerging technology and thereby b) initiates new debates within the realm of ethics of technology. This discussion touches c) on fundamental questions with regard to the epistemology of pain and the epistemic status of a (competent) knower. The paper seeks to better understand testimonial injustice as a concept by transferring it to the epistemically challenging topic of pain knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01074-9
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can You Feel My Pain Tonight? – Automated Pain Assessment and Epistemic Injustice

Wulf Loh
Philosophy & Technology
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Can You Feel My Pain Tonight? – Automated Pain Assessment and Epistemic Injustice

Wulf Loh
article en

Abstract

Automated pain assessment systems (APAS) are currently being developed to facilitate third-party pain assessments in patients with limited verbal communication abilities. They come with the danger, however, of disregarding patients in their capacity as competent knowers of their own pain experiences. Favoring the predictions of APAS over the self-reports of pain experiences may constitute a particular severe form of testimonial injustice, as we seem to have a special epistemic authority with regard to them. By investigating these potential dangers, the paper a) points to implications for pain management in the face of an emerging technology and thereby b) initiates new debates within the realm of ethics of technology. This discussion touches c) on fundamental questions with regard to the epistemology of pain and the epistemic status of a (competent) knower. The paper seeks to better understand testimonial injustice as a concept by transferring it to the epistemically challenging topic of pain knowledge.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(2)
STZ eyetrial (DE)
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.