Comparative effects of some pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Given the growing global public health burden of Alzheimer's disease, this study used the Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in the population with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Two investigators screened the literature from English databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science) and three major Chinese bibliographical databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database). We assessed the risk of bias and publication bias of the selected literature. Subsequently, a Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted to further investigate the comparative efficacy of different interventions on cognitive outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4788 cases were initially identified. Photobiomodulation [SMD=0.66, 95%CrI (0.29, 1.02)], enriching environment [SMD=0.69, 95%CrI (0.08, 1.31)], pharmacological therapy [SMD=0.36, 95%CrI (0.17, 0.55)], cognitive stimulation therapy [SMD=0.32, 95%CrI (0.11, 0.55)] and exercise therapy [SMD=0.28, 95%CrI (0.06, 0.51)] showed considerable enhancements in cognitive function among individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Photobiomodulation and enriching environment stood out, with their effects more potent than those of other therapies, as indicated by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve - photobiomodulation clocked in at 87.3%, while enriching environment scored 83.8%, versus pharmacological therapy's 54.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Among the interventions evaluated, photobiomodulation and enriching environment were associated with better improvements in cognitive function than pharmacological therapy. Exercise therapy and cognitive stimulation therapy also demonstrated beneficial effects. Music therapy showed no statistical difference from the control group. In addition, the research developed an innovative approach to contrast pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer's disease. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251075628. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251075628.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100564
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effects of some pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Can Huang, Xiaoxv Yin, Guangxin Luo, Fang Wang et al.
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Comparative effects of some pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Can Huang, Xiaoxv Yin, Guangxin Luo, Fang Wang, Yong Gan, Yuning Zhao, Zhenyang Chen, Yu Wei, Qiaosen Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the growing global public health burden of Alzheimer's disease, this study used the Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in the population with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Two investigators screened the literature from English databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science) and three major Chinese bibliographical databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database). We assessed the risk of bias and publication bias of the selected literature. Subsequently, a Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted to further investigate the comparative efficacy of different interventions on cognitive outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4788 cases were initially identified. Photobiomodulation [SMD=0.66, 95%CrI (0.29, 1.02)], enriching environment [SMD=0.69, 95%CrI (0.08, 1.31)], pharmacological therapy [SMD=0.36, 95%CrI (0.17, 0.55)], cognitive stimulation therapy [SMD=0.32, 95%CrI (0.11, 0.55)] and exercise therapy [SMD=0.28, 95%CrI (0.06, 0.51)] showed considerable enhancements in cognitive function among individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Photobiomodulation and enriching environment stood out, with their effects more potent than those of other therapies, as indicated by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve - photobiomodulation clocked in at 87.3%, while enriching environment scored 83.8%, versus pharmacological therapy's 54.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Among the interventions evaluated, photobiomodulation and enriching environment were associated with better improvements in cognitive function than pharmacological therapy. Exercise therapy and cognitive stimulation therapy also demonstrated beneficial effects. Music therapy showed no statistical difference from the control group. In addition, the research developed an innovative approach to contrast pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer's disease. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251075628. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251075628.

The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 13(6)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), The Fourth People's Hospital (CN), Wuhu Fourth People Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.