Thoracolumbar burst fractures: robot-assisted mono-segment fixation with vertebral body grafting versus short-segment fixation — a propensity score-matched cohort study

PURPOSE: To compare robot-assisted mono-segment pedicle fixation with vertebral body grafting (RMF-VBG) versus conventional short-segment fixation with grafting (SF-VBG) for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, focusing on radiographic maintenance of correction and perioperative efficiency. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study (2018-2022) including adults with single-level AO-A3 fractures (T11-L2), ASIA E, treated within 14 days. One-to-one propensity score matching balanced baseline factors. The primary endpoint was loss of sagittal Cobb angle (SCA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay (postop LOS), pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral body height ratio (AVBHr), pedicle screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins), facet joint violation (FJV), perioperative morbidity and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were matched (76 per group). RMF-VBG achieved significantly shorter operative time (62.38 ± 14.26 vs 89.56 ± 20.36 min), reduced blood loss (82.54 ± 19.69 vs 126.38 ± 28.26 mL), and shorter postop LOS (5.23 ± 1.72 vs 7.16 ± 1.39 days; all p<0.001). SCA and AVBHr trajectories were comparable; SCA loss at 12 months did not differ (mean difference -0.07°, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.16; p = 0.551). The 95% CI for the between-group difference in 12-month SCA loss remained within the ±2.0° MCID, indicating no clinically important difference. Screw placement accuracy (Grade A) was higher with RMF-VBG (98.35% vs 90.13%), and FJV Grade 2 was less frequent (0% vs 3.95%). Overall morbidity and ASD were uncommon and similar between groups. CONCLUSION: For selected thoracolumbar burst fractures, RMF-VBG maintained sagittal correction within the prespecified MCID compared with SF-VBG, while improving perioperative efficiency and screw-related precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09894-1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thoracolumbar burst fractures: robot-assisted mono-segment fixation with vertebral body grafting versus short-segment fixation — a propensity score-matched cohort study

Junjie Qiao, Yuyu Fan, Xiutong Fang, Ruizhao Zhao et al.
European Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Thoracolumbar burst fractures: robot-assisted mono-segment fixation with vertebral body grafting versus short-segment fixation — a propensity score-matched cohort study

Junjie Qiao, Yuyu Fan, Xiutong Fang, Ruizhao Zhao, Xinyao Lv
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare robot-assisted mono-segment pedicle fixation with vertebral body grafting (RMF-VBG) versus conventional short-segment fixation with grafting (SF-VBG) for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, focusing on radiographic maintenance of correction and perioperative efficiency. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study (2018-2022) including adults with single-level AO-A3 fractures (T11-L2), ASIA E, treated within 14 days. One-to-one propensity score matching balanced baseline factors. The primary endpoint was loss of sagittal Cobb angle (SCA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative length of stay (postop LOS), pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral body height ratio (AVBHr), pedicle screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins), facet joint violation (FJV), perioperative morbidity and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were matched (76 per group). RMF-VBG achieved significantly shorter operative time (62.38 ± 14.26 vs 89.56 ± 20.36 min), reduced blood loss (82.54 ± 19.69 vs 126.38 ± 28.26 mL), and shorter postop LOS (5.23 ± 1.72 vs 7.16 ± 1.39 days; all p<0.001). SCA and AVBHr trajectories were comparable; SCA loss at 12 months did not differ (mean difference -0.07°, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.16; p = 0.551). The 95% CI for the between-group difference in 12-month SCA loss remained within the ±2.0° MCID, indicating no clinically important difference. Screw placement accuracy (Grade A) was higher with RMF-VBG (98.35% vs 90.13%), and FJV Grade 2 was less frequent (0% vs 3.95%). Overall morbidity and ASD were uncommon and similar between groups. CONCLUSION: For selected thoracolumbar burst fractures, RMF-VBG maintained sagittal correction within the prespecified MCID compared with SF-VBG, while improving perioperative efficiency and screw-related precision.

European Spine Journal
Beijing Shijitan Hospital (CN)
National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.