Finding Receptive Donors: Unpacking the Dynamics of Social Influence in Large‐Scale Political Donor Networks

ABSTRACT Although previous studies tend to emphasize the role of influencers in donation campaigns, this study shifts attention to focus on influencees, namely donors who are highly receptive to the influence of others within local social networks. We integrated insights from social influence research with that of the COM‐B model and examined the distribution of influencees in eight donor populations. In addition, we examined how donors' capabilities, opportunities, and motivations influence their propensity to be influencees. We found that across eight mutually exclusive donor networks, about 10% of donors can be classified as influencees and they, on average, donate two to 10 times more than other donors. Our analysis consistently demonstrated that donors with extensive connections and those associated with tightly interconnected clusters were more inclined to be influencees. Social influence was clearly present and played a large role for these influencees. Additionally, both the capability and motivation of donors played crucial roles in accurately pinpointing the most receptive individuals to social influence. Notably, disparities were observed among different racial groups. Overall, models that integrated all three sets of COM‐B factors exhibited superior predictive performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70051
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding Receptive Donors: Unpacking the Dynamics of Social Influence in Large‐Scale Political Donor Networks

Dmitri Williams, Aimei Yang
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Finding Receptive Donors: Unpacking the Dynamics of Social Influence in Large‐Scale Political Donor Networks

Dmitri Williams, Aimei Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although previous studies tend to emphasize the role of influencers in donation campaigns, this study shifts attention to focus on influencees, namely donors who are highly receptive to the influence of others within local social networks. We integrated insights from social influence research with that of the COM‐B model and examined the distribution of influencees in eight donor populations. In addition, we examined how donors' capabilities, opportunities, and motivations influence their propensity to be influencees. We found that across eight mutually exclusive donor networks, about 10% of donors can be classified as influencees and they, on average, donate two to 10 times more than other donors. Our analysis consistently demonstrated that donors with extensive connections and those associated with tightly interconnected clusters were more inclined to be influencees. Social influence was clearly present and played a large role for these influencees. Additionally, both the capability and motivation of donors played crucial roles in accurately pinpointing the most receptive individuals to social influence. Notably, disparities were observed among different racial groups. Overall, models that integrated all three sets of COM‐B factors exhibited superior predictive performance.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership
University of Southern California (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.