Management of Ankle Sprains in Urgent Care: Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines

Background Ankle injuries are among the most common reasons for urgent care visits. Evidence-based guidelines, particularly the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR), aim to standardize assessment and reduce unnecessary imaging. Despite strong evidence supporting their diagnostic accuracy, clinicians' adherence remains variable. This variability can lead to suboptimal patient outcomes, such as chronic joint instability and increased healthcare costs. This study assesses physicians' compliance with OAR and related management recommendations and identifies barriers that hinder appropriate guideline use. Objectives The primary objective is to measure the prevalence of adherence to evidence-based guidelines, specifically the OAR, among urgent care physicians. Secondary objectives include evaluating physicians' self-reported familiarity with these guidelines, identifying associated factors affecting compliance, and exploring perceived barriers to implementation. Methods A cross-sectional analytical survey was distributed electronically to physicians working in urgent care and emergency services. A total of 74 participants completed the questionnaire. The survey addressed physicians' use of OAR, rehabilitation advice, perceived barriers, and training background. Results While only 41.9% routinely applied structured rehabilitation protocols, 70.3% of physicians reported using the OAR. Most respondents (83.8%) provided patient education regarding prevention and rehab. However, 68.9% indicated a need for further training. The most commonly cited barriers were time constraints (32.4%), inadequate guideline training (31.1%), insufficient resources (14.9%), and patient non-adherence (19.4%). Additionally, 87.7% had not attended recent workshops, though 85.1% expressed willingness to receive further education. Conclusion The study reveals inconsistencies in adhering to ankle injury guidelines in urgent care. Enhancing clinician training and implementing standardized protocols can reduce diagnostic errors and unnecessary imaging. Ongoing education and quality improvement initiatives are essential for providing better care for ankle injuries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106852
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of Ankle Sprains in Urgent Care: Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines

Musaad N Al Musaad, Maram M Alharbi
Cureus
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Management of Ankle Sprains in Urgent Care: Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines

Musaad N Al Musaad, Maram M Alharbi
article en

Abstract

Background Ankle injuries are among the most common reasons for urgent care visits. Evidence-based guidelines, particularly the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR), aim to standardize assessment and reduce unnecessary imaging. Despite strong evidence supporting their diagnostic accuracy, clinicians' adherence remains variable. This variability can lead to suboptimal patient outcomes, such as chronic joint instability and increased healthcare costs. This study assesses physicians' compliance with OAR and related management recommendations and identifies barriers that hinder appropriate guideline use. Objectives The primary objective is to measure the prevalence of adherence to evidence-based guidelines, specifically the OAR, among urgent care physicians. Secondary objectives include evaluating physicians' self-reported familiarity with these guidelines, identifying associated factors affecting compliance, and exploring perceived barriers to implementation. Methods A cross-sectional analytical survey was distributed electronically to physicians working in urgent care and emergency services. A total of 74 participants completed the questionnaire. The survey addressed physicians' use of OAR, rehabilitation advice, perceived barriers, and training background. Results While only 41.9% routinely applied structured rehabilitation protocols, 70.3% of physicians reported using the OAR. Most respondents (83.8%) provided patient education regarding prevention and rehab. However, 68.9% indicated a need for further training. The most commonly cited barriers were time constraints (32.4%), inadequate guideline training (31.1%), insufficient resources (14.9%), and patient non-adherence (19.4%). Additionally, 87.7% had not attended recent workshops, though 85.1% expressed willingness to receive further education. Conclusion The study reveals inconsistencies in adhering to ankle injury guidelines in urgent care. Enhancing clinician training and implementing standardized protocols can reduce diagnostic errors and unnecessary imaging. Ongoing education and quality improvement initiatives are essential for providing better care for ankle injuries.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.